Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
235 Three Types of Vorhandenheit DAVID WEINBERGER The category of Vorhandenheit' in Heidegger's Sein und Zeit (SZ) is much more puzzling than it seems at first. On first reading it seems that Zuhandenheit is the primordial way in which things are: the primordial Being of things is their presence to us as handy tools within the context of our project and the workshop context (the hammer is understood as part of our projects to build a house and with reference to nails, lumber etc.) Vorhandenheit seems to be nothing but a privative way of Being which we achieve by stripping Zuhandene of their contextual meaning so we can just gaze at them as if they were nothing but lumps of matter, devoid of significance. For something to become vorhanden we must cease unreflectively using it and must in- stead step back and reflect on it cognitively. If, however, we attempt to think through the category of Vorhandenheit (a task Heidegger does not make easy for us), we find that it is more complex and primordial than it seemed at first look. In- deed, we shall find that Vorhandenheit in SZ is not a univocal term; there are at
Research in Phenomenology – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1980
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.