Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Politics of Interpretation in Basil of Caesarea's Hexaemeron*

The Politics of Interpretation in Basil of Caesarea's Hexaemeron* THE POLITICS OF INTERPRETATION IN BASIL OF CAESAREA'S HEXAEMERON* BY RICHARD LIM The Hexaemeron of Basil the Great (t 379), delivered before a Caesarean congregation on three separate days in mid-378 towards the end of his career, is often held up as an example of Basil's opposition to the allegorical method of exegesis.' The locus classicus for this con- clusion is Basil's discussion of the meaning of the creation of the firma- ment, and in the ninth homily where he makes an even more explicit stand against the use of allegorical interpretations and declares that he prefers the literal sense: WS ezpyizott 06<mq In the Hexaemeron and elsewhere, Basil shows a familiarity with the allegorical method. In about 358, he and Gregory of Nazianzus edited the Philocalia, a compilation of the writings of their admired Origen. 3 The first section of the Philocalia is devoted to Origen's exegetical prin- ciples. The selection is concerned with the divine inspiration of scrip- tures, the problems of biblical language and stresses the importance of spiritual exegesis." Therefore, there can be no question that Basil was well acquainted with what is commonly called the "Alexandrian" allegorical method. The fact that he included http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Vigiliae Christianae Brill

The Politics of Interpretation in Basil of Caesarea's Hexaemeron*

Vigiliae Christianae , Volume 44 (4): 351 – Jan 1, 1990

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/the-politics-of-interpretation-in-basil-of-caesarea-s-hexaemeron-c3KWo53gNI

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1990 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0042-6032
eISSN
1570-0720
DOI
10.1163/157007290X00117
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

THE POLITICS OF INTERPRETATION IN BASIL OF CAESAREA'S HEXAEMERON* BY RICHARD LIM The Hexaemeron of Basil the Great (t 379), delivered before a Caesarean congregation on three separate days in mid-378 towards the end of his career, is often held up as an example of Basil's opposition to the allegorical method of exegesis.' The locus classicus for this con- clusion is Basil's discussion of the meaning of the creation of the firma- ment, and in the ninth homily where he makes an even more explicit stand against the use of allegorical interpretations and declares that he prefers the literal sense: WS ezpyizott 06<mq In the Hexaemeron and elsewhere, Basil shows a familiarity with the allegorical method. In about 358, he and Gregory of Nazianzus edited the Philocalia, a compilation of the writings of their admired Origen. 3 The first section of the Philocalia is devoted to Origen's exegetical prin- ciples. The selection is concerned with the divine inspiration of scrip- tures, the problems of biblical language and stresses the importance of spiritual exegesis." Therefore, there can be no question that Basil was well acquainted with what is commonly called the "Alexandrian" allegorical method. The fact that he included

Journal

Vigiliae ChristianaeBrill

Published: Jan 1, 1990

There are no references for this article.