The Intersectionality of Gender, Rights, and Privilege: A Comparative Analysis of 127 Countries

The Intersectionality of Gender, Rights, and Privilege: A Comparative Analysis of 127 Countries This study provides a macro-level comparison of the rights and privileges that women have around the world through the development of a multi-dimensional index of pro-woman states. This is important because states that score highly on the index provide models for decreasing gender inequalities and increasing human rights for women worldwide. Cross-national differences in female education, employment, reproductive freedom, and participation in state policy formation are explored. Pro-woman states have policies that are associated with higher levels of education, income, and satisfaction. An understanding of the rights and privileges provided in pro-woman states can be used to restructure the welfare state to encourage the empowerment of women and the development of more equal societies. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Comparative Sociology Brill

The Intersectionality of Gender, Rights, and Privilege: A Comparative Analysis of 127 Countries

The Intersectionality of Gender, Rights, and Privilege: A Comparative Analysis of 127 Countries


Introduction An overlooked element of comparative stratification is the state structuring of female empowerment. There is wide variation across states in the provision of rights and opportunities for women. Some states, those that are considered to be pro-woman by Orloff (1993), focus on problems and issues concerning families, women, and children. In states that have highly expansive pro-woman policies, women have access to education, employment, and services such as daycare and family leave. Additionally, they have legal control over their reproductive systems and enjoy full rights of citizenship. These rights and benefits then make it possible for women to participate fully in society, to be true equals to men, to pursue careers which enable them to be financially self-sufficient, and to raise families with some level of state protection. However, Orloff (1993) and others note that there is heterogeneity across states in pro-woman policies. Women in relatively few countries around the world enjoy a full range of rights and privileges. It is therefore important to examine how different political systems shape social institutions and impact individual lives. A conceptual focus on pro-woman states is necessary because these states may help diminish traditional gender roles and gender stratification by providing structural opportunities for women (Wang 2004; Wernet, Elman, and Pendleton 2005). Comparative, country level data on multiple domains, such as female life expectancy, low fertility rates, education levels, the legal status of abortion, the percent of women in public life, income equity, and family leave policies, are gathered from the Population Reference Bureau (2005; 2011; 2013), the Global Gender Gap Report (2012), and the International Labor Organization (2010). This paper explores the differential access that people in 127 countries have to the aforementioned rights and privileges in order to identify which countries have policies that are the most...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/the-intersectionality-of-gender-rights-and-privilege-a-comparative-dVYJ7yKkS4
Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
1569-1322
eISSN
1569-1330
D.O.I.
10.1163/15691330-12341384
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study provides a macro-level comparison of the rights and privileges that women have around the world through the development of a multi-dimensional index of pro-woman states. This is important because states that score highly on the index provide models for decreasing gender inequalities and increasing human rights for women worldwide. Cross-national differences in female education, employment, reproductive freedom, and participation in state policy formation are explored. Pro-woman states have policies that are associated with higher levels of education, income, and satisfaction. An understanding of the rights and privileges provided in pro-woman states can be used to restructure the welfare state to encourage the empowerment of women and the development of more equal societies.

Journal

Comparative SociologyBrill

Published: Apr 7, 2016

Keywords: pro-woman state; cross-national comparison; gendered state; comparative political sociology; gender equality; country-level characteristics

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off