Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/brill/the-content-and-meaning-of-the-transition-from-the-theory-of-relations-rqZ8FNn37a
References
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
- Publisher
- Brill
- Copyright
- © 2010 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
- ISSN
- 0085-5553
- eISSN
- 1569-1640
- DOI
- 10.1163/156916410X524475
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In the third Logical Investigation Husserl presents an integrated theory of wholes and parts based on the notions of dependency, foundation (Fundierung), and aprioricity. Careful examination of the literature reveals misconceptions regarding the meaning and scope of the central axis of this theory, especially with respect to its proper context within the development of Husserl’s thought. The present paper will establish this context and in the process correct a number of these misconceptions. The presentation of mereology in the Logical Investigations will be shown to originate largely from Husserl’s implicit self-criticism of his prior views on the unity of a whole presented in his first work, Philosophy of Arithmetic.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
Journal
Research in Phenomenology – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2010
Keywords: part; fusion; whole; Husserl; mereology; foundation