Running Uphill: Political Opportunity in Non-democracies

Running Uphill: Political Opportunity in Non-democracies Running Uphill: Political Opportunity in Non-democracies M ARYJANE O SA * AND C RISTINA C ORDUNEANU -H UCI ** A BSTRACT This study analyzes twenty-four cases of occurrence/non- occurrence of mobilization in non-democratic states to deter- mine conditions of political opportunity in high-risk authori- tarian contexts. Ragin’s (1987) Boolean method of qualitative comparison (QCA 3.0) is used to identify speciŽ c conŽ gura- tions of conditions that constitute political opportunity in non- democracies. We Ž nd that political opportunity is sensitive to conditions created by divided elites, changes in repression, media access, in uential allies, and social networks. Our analysis identiŽ es four conŽ gurations that create an opening for mobilization under authoritarian conditions. The key factors, identiŽ ed by QCA in the most parsimonious model, are media access and social networks. These two factors are sufŽ cient conditions for producing mobilization in non-democratic states. Introduction How is it possible for oppressed groups to mobilize to act on their grievances in a repressive, authoritarian state? The dominant political process theory of social mobilization and related studies of contentious politics primarily focus on protest in democratic societies (Diani 1996; * Department of Sociology, Northwestern University, Evanston. ** Department of http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Comparative Sociology Brill

Running Uphill: Political Opportunity in Non-democracies

Comparative Sociology, Volume 2 (4): 605 – Jan 1, 2003

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/running-uphill-political-opportunity-in-non-democracies-JgQiZHZuMN
Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2003 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
1569-1322
eISSN
1569-1330
D.O.I.
10.1163/156913303322661883
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Running Uphill: Political Opportunity in Non-democracies M ARYJANE O SA * AND C RISTINA C ORDUNEANU -H UCI ** A BSTRACT This study analyzes twenty-four cases of occurrence/non- occurrence of mobilization in non-democratic states to deter- mine conditions of political opportunity in high-risk authori- tarian contexts. Ragin’s (1987) Boolean method of qualitative comparison (QCA 3.0) is used to identify speciŽ c conŽ gura- tions of conditions that constitute political opportunity in non- democracies. We Ž nd that political opportunity is sensitive to conditions created by divided elites, changes in repression, media access, in uential allies, and social networks. Our analysis identiŽ es four conŽ gurations that create an opening for mobilization under authoritarian conditions. The key factors, identiŽ ed by QCA in the most parsimonious model, are media access and social networks. These two factors are sufŽ cient conditions for producing mobilization in non-democratic states. Introduction How is it possible for oppressed groups to mobilize to act on their grievances in a repressive, authoritarian state? The dominant political process theory of social mobilization and related studies of contentious politics primarily focus on protest in democratic societies (Diani 1996; * Department of Sociology, Northwestern University, Evanston. ** Department of

Journal

Comparative SociologyBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2003

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off