REVOCATION OF ENDURING AMNESTIES VS. PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY: JURISPRUDENTIAL CONTESTATIONS BETWEEN THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND DOMESTIC COURTS

REVOCATION OF ENDURING AMNESTIES VS. PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY: JURISPRUDENTIAL CONTESTATIONS BETWEEN... International human rights bodies have declared amnesties for serious human rights violations incompatible with human rights law. As a result, amnesties have been revoked many years after their award. They have thus enabled criminal prosecutions for alleged crimes committed in the distant past. This has particularly been the case in the Inter-American system. Currently, a long debate on the compatibility of amnesties with human rights norms is taking place. The present contribution focuses on a topic hitherto at the fringes of this debate; namely, whether the revocation of amnesties and the initiation of proceedings against the accused, many years after the award of the amnesty, are consistent with the principle of legality. Certain domestic courts have argued that they are not, while the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has decided otherwise. This Article reflects on the reasoning of both sides. It argues that the revocation of amnesties raises valid concerns as regards the principle of legality, which should be seriously considered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. It is suggested that the protection of the accused from the risk of a trial made unfair due to the passing of time and the rights of victims of access to justice require the performance of a more nuanced balancing exercise on the part of the Court. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online Brill

REVOCATION OF ENDURING AMNESTIES VS. PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY: JURISPRUDENTIAL CONTESTATIONS BETWEEN THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND DOMESTIC COURTS

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/revocation-of-enduring-amnesties-vs-principle-of-legality-aaQ2f3gbPC
Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
eISSN
2211-6133
D.O.I.
10.1163/22116133-90000160
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

International human rights bodies have declared amnesties for serious human rights violations incompatible with human rights law. As a result, amnesties have been revoked many years after their award. They have thus enabled criminal prosecutions for alleged crimes committed in the distant past. This has particularly been the case in the Inter-American system. Currently, a long debate on the compatibility of amnesties with human rights norms is taking place. The present contribution focuses on a topic hitherto at the fringes of this debate; namely, whether the revocation of amnesties and the initiation of proceedings against the accused, many years after the award of the amnesty, are consistent with the principle of legality. Certain domestic courts have argued that they are not, while the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has decided otherwise. This Article reflects on the reasoning of both sides. It argues that the revocation of amnesties raises valid concerns as regards the principle of legality, which should be seriously considered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. It is suggested that the protection of the accused from the risk of a trial made unfair due to the passing of time and the rights of victims of access to justice require the performance of a more nuanced balancing exercise on the part of the Court.

Journal

The Italian Yearbook of International Law OnlineBrill

Published: Oct 11, 2017

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off