Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Response to Steven G. Crowell and Daniel O. Dahlstrom

Response to Steven G. Crowell and Daniel O. Dahlstrom Let me first express my gratitude to Steven Crowell and Daniel Dahlstrom for having agreed to participate in this session, which Theodore George has so effectively organized. It is a great honor to me that such highly esteemed scholars have read my book so closely and carefully. Their considerations have been a very productive challenge for me, and I will do my best to take up their points, at least their main points, and hopefully to give convincing answers to their questions. Thereby my intention is not so much to comment on what I have written more than seven years ago, in order to explain what I then had meant. As soon as a book has been published, its author has turned into a reader whose only adequate task can be to contribute to its subject matter. Meanwhile, I am still working on this subject matter, from a different perspective, stressing other aspects than I did in the book. This shows that the subject matter of Objectivity is still important for me. And, as I have been lucky to experience, not only for me. As I dare say, not least on the basis of Steve’s and Dan’s considerations, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Research in Phenomenology Brill

Response to Steven G. Crowell and Daniel O. Dahlstrom

Research in Phenomenology , Volume 44 (1): 135 – Mar 26, 2014

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/response-to-steven-g-crowell-and-daniel-o-dahlstrom-Lv3quiuo1J
Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
Subject
Discussion Günter Figal’s Objectivity
ISSN
0085-5553
eISSN
1569-1640
DOI
10.1163/15691640-12341280
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Let me first express my gratitude to Steven Crowell and Daniel Dahlstrom for having agreed to participate in this session, which Theodore George has so effectively organized. It is a great honor to me that such highly esteemed scholars have read my book so closely and carefully. Their considerations have been a very productive challenge for me, and I will do my best to take up their points, at least their main points, and hopefully to give convincing answers to their questions. Thereby my intention is not so much to comment on what I have written more than seven years ago, in order to explain what I then had meant. As soon as a book has been published, its author has turned into a reader whose only adequate task can be to contribute to its subject matter. Meanwhile, I am still working on this subject matter, from a different perspective, stressing other aspects than I did in the book. This shows that the subject matter of Objectivity is still important for me. And, as I have been lucky to experience, not only for me. As I dare say, not least on the basis of Steve’s and Dan’s considerations,

Journal

Research in PhenomenologyBrill

Published: Mar 26, 2014

There are no references for this article.