Insolubilia and the Fallacy Secundum Quid et Simpliciter

Insolubilia and the Fallacy Secundum Quid et Simpliciter © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2008 DOI: 10.1163/004275408X311258 Vivarium 46 (2008) 175-191 www.brill.nl/viv v i v a r i u m Insolubilia and the Fallacy Secundum Quid et Simpliciter Catarina Dutilh Novaes University of Amsterdam Stephen Read University of St Andrews, UK Abstract Th omas Bradwardine makes much of the fact that his solution to the insolubles is in accordance with Aristotle’s diagnosis of the fallacy in the Liar paradox as that of secun- dum quid et simpliciter . Paul Spade, however, claims that this invocation of Aristotle by Bradwardine is purely “honorary” in order to confer specious respectability on his analysis and give it a spurious weight of authority. Our answer to Spade follows Brad- wardine’s response to the problem of revenge: any proposition saying of itself that it is false says more than does Bradwardine’s proposition saying of it that it is false, and so follows from that other proposition only in respect of part of what it says, and not simpliciter . Keywords fallacy, insolubilia ; Bradwardine, Spade 1. Introduction It is widely recognized that the historical development of Liar paradoxes in the later Middle Ages, then known as Insolubilia , is intimately related to http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Vivarium Brill

Insolubilia and the Fallacy Secundum Quid et Simpliciter

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/insolubilia-and-the-fallacy-secundum-quid-et-simpliciter-1hhB7L21P0
Publisher
BRILL
Copyright
© 2008 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0042-7543
eISSN
1568-5349
D.O.I.
10.1163/004275408X311258
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2008 DOI: 10.1163/004275408X311258 Vivarium 46 (2008) 175-191 www.brill.nl/viv v i v a r i u m Insolubilia and the Fallacy Secundum Quid et Simpliciter Catarina Dutilh Novaes University of Amsterdam Stephen Read University of St Andrews, UK Abstract Th omas Bradwardine makes much of the fact that his solution to the insolubles is in accordance with Aristotle’s diagnosis of the fallacy in the Liar paradox as that of secun- dum quid et simpliciter . Paul Spade, however, claims that this invocation of Aristotle by Bradwardine is purely “honorary” in order to confer specious respectability on his analysis and give it a spurious weight of authority. Our answer to Spade follows Brad- wardine’s response to the problem of revenge: any proposition saying of itself that it is false says more than does Bradwardine’s proposition saying of it that it is false, and so follows from that other proposition only in respect of part of what it says, and not simpliciter . Keywords fallacy, insolubilia ; Bradwardine, Spade 1. Introduction It is widely recognized that the historical development of Liar paradoxes in the later Middle Ages, then known as Insolubilia , is intimately related to

Journal

VivariumBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2008

Keywords: FALLACY; SPADE; INSOLUBILIA; BRADWARDINE

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial