Harvey's and Highmore's Accounts of Chick Generation

Harvey's and Highmore's Accounts of Chick Generation © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2008 DOI : 10.1163/157338208X362697 Early Science and Medicine 13 (2008) 568-614 www.brill.nl/esm Harvey’s and Highmore’s Accounts of Chick Generation Karin J. Ekholm * Indiana University, Bloomington Abstract Harvey and Highmore experimented together on chick fetuses at Oxford in the early 1640s, yet in 1651 published significantly diferent treatises on generation that empha- size their reliance on observations and dissections of fetal chicks at diferent stages of incuba tion. The key diferences follow from their views on matter and souls. Harvey conceives of living bodies as governed by Aristotelian souls and faculties. Highmore views matter as made of corpuscles and describes organs as involved in chemical pro- cedures. Highmore’s treatise is a response to Digby’s claim that heat, moisture, and pressure could explain generation. Although Digby’s treatment lacks Harvey’s and Highmore’s attention to detail, it ofers a point of comparison that leads to a more nuanced understanding of their explanation. Moreover, Highmore’s dedication of his work to Boyle provides a new perspective on both men’s intellectual evolution from the latter part of the 1640s to 1651. Keywords generation, atomism, forms, epigenesis, mechanism, chemistry The generation of living beings posed some of the most intractable http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Early Science and Medicine Brill

Harvey's and Highmore's Accounts of Chick Generation

Early Science and Medicine, Volume 13 (6): 568 – Jan 1, 2008

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/harvey-s-and-highmore-s-accounts-of-chick-generation-wleh0z3rP3
Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2008 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
1383-7427
eISSN
1573-3823
D.O.I.
10.1163/157338208X362697
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2008 DOI : 10.1163/157338208X362697 Early Science and Medicine 13 (2008) 568-614 www.brill.nl/esm Harvey’s and Highmore’s Accounts of Chick Generation Karin J. Ekholm * Indiana University, Bloomington Abstract Harvey and Highmore experimented together on chick fetuses at Oxford in the early 1640s, yet in 1651 published significantly diferent treatises on generation that empha- size their reliance on observations and dissections of fetal chicks at diferent stages of incuba tion. The key diferences follow from their views on matter and souls. Harvey conceives of living bodies as governed by Aristotelian souls and faculties. Highmore views matter as made of corpuscles and describes organs as involved in chemical pro- cedures. Highmore’s treatise is a response to Digby’s claim that heat, moisture, and pressure could explain generation. Although Digby’s treatment lacks Harvey’s and Highmore’s attention to detail, it ofers a point of comparison that leads to a more nuanced understanding of their explanation. Moreover, Highmore’s dedication of his work to Boyle provides a new perspective on both men’s intellectual evolution from the latter part of the 1640s to 1651. Keywords generation, atomism, forms, epigenesis, mechanism, chemistry The generation of living beings posed some of the most intractable

Journal

Early Science and MedicineBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2008

Keywords: CHEMISTRY; ATOMISM; MECHANISM; GENERATION; FORMS; EPIGENESIS

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off