Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Governance of Migration in the EU: Home Affairs or Foreign Policy?

Governance of Migration in the EU: Home Affairs or Foreign Policy? It is fundamental that foreign countries concerned about the status, safety, and security of their nationals in the United States must be able to confer and communicate on this subject with one national sovereign, not the 50 separate States. Arizona v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 2492 (2012) This affirmation by Justice Kennedy written for the majority opinion of the US Supreme Court on 25 June 2012 would not have been possible in Europe, at least not for the time being. Construed as an essentially internal policy, part of the area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ) and closely linked with the abolition of internal borders, EU immigration policy is only developing its external dimension, in sharp contrast to the American construction of immigration as an integral part of foreign relations. Yet, this was not always the case. Originally, immigration was used in and by the EEC to enhance integration (and interdependence) between states through deregulatory concessions on cross-border mobility of economic actors. EC law secured migration-related rights to workers, service providers, and later also service recipients 1 – rights that could be enforced against the state directly in national courts, fuelling bottom-up integration. Enforcement of an agreement http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Migration and Law Brill

Governance of Migration in the EU: Home Affairs or Foreign Policy?

European Journal of Migration and Law , Volume 15 (3): 239 – Jan 1, 2013

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/governance-of-migration-in-the-eu-home-affairs-or-foreign-policy-O2pR6hFDEo
Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
Subject
Editorial
ISSN
1388-364X
eISSN
1571-8166
DOI
10.1163/15718166-00002034
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

It is fundamental that foreign countries concerned about the status, safety, and security of their nationals in the United States must be able to confer and communicate on this subject with one national sovereign, not the 50 separate States. Arizona v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 2492 (2012) This affirmation by Justice Kennedy written for the majority opinion of the US Supreme Court on 25 June 2012 would not have been possible in Europe, at least not for the time being. Construed as an essentially internal policy, part of the area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ) and closely linked with the abolition of internal borders, EU immigration policy is only developing its external dimension, in sharp contrast to the American construction of immigration as an integral part of foreign relations. Yet, this was not always the case. Originally, immigration was used in and by the EEC to enhance integration (and interdependence) between states through deregulatory concessions on cross-border mobility of economic actors. EC law secured migration-related rights to workers, service providers, and later also service recipients 1 – rights that could be enforced against the state directly in national courts, fuelling bottom-up integration. Enforcement of an agreement

Journal

European Journal of Migration and LawBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2013

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$499/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month