Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Freshwater origin of Bathynellacea (Malacostraca)

Freshwater origin of Bathynellacea (Malacostraca) There are two opposing hypotheses on the origin of Bathynellacea, a marine and a freshwater one. According to the marine hypothesis, Bathynellacea invaded continental groundwater from the sea via the interstitial of marine beaches (“two-step model”), whereas according to the freshwater hypothesis the groundwater was reached from the sea via fresh surface waters and the interstitial of gravelly banks of rivers and streams. According to the marine hypothesis adaptation to life in groundwater happened again and again with practically no subsequent dispersion in this habitat; occurrence in brackish water is primary, that in freshwater secondary; co-occurrence of Bathynellacea with faunal elements of incontestably marine origin is primary and indicative of a marine origin of Bathynellacea as well. According to the freshwater hypothesis there is adaptation to life in groundwater and subsequent large-scale dispersion in it; occurrence in freshwater is primary, that in brackish water secondary; co-occurrence of Bathynellacea with faunal elements of incontestably marine origin is secondary and not indicative of a marine origin of Bathynellacea. These differences are critically discussed with the result that more seems to speak for a freshwater origin. The two-step model with the genus Iberobathynella Schminke, 1973 as an example is scrutinized and found to be incomplete and until now not sufficiently supported. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Crustaceana Brill

Freshwater origin of Bathynellacea (Malacostraca)

Crustaceana , Volume 87 (10): 18 – Apr 16, 2014

Loading next page...
1
 
/lp/brill/freshwater-origin-of-bathynellacea-malacostraca-BYqhju700c

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
Subject
Articles
ISSN
0011-216x
eISSN
1568-5403
DOI
10.1163/15685403-00003322
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

There are two opposing hypotheses on the origin of Bathynellacea, a marine and a freshwater one. According to the marine hypothesis, Bathynellacea invaded continental groundwater from the sea via the interstitial of marine beaches (“two-step model”), whereas according to the freshwater hypothesis the groundwater was reached from the sea via fresh surface waters and the interstitial of gravelly banks of rivers and streams. According to the marine hypothesis adaptation to life in groundwater happened again and again with practically no subsequent dispersion in this habitat; occurrence in brackish water is primary, that in freshwater secondary; co-occurrence of Bathynellacea with faunal elements of incontestably marine origin is primary and indicative of a marine origin of Bathynellacea as well. According to the freshwater hypothesis there is adaptation to life in groundwater and subsequent large-scale dispersion in it; occurrence in freshwater is primary, that in brackish water secondary; co-occurrence of Bathynellacea with faunal elements of incontestably marine origin is secondary and not indicative of a marine origin of Bathynellacea. These differences are critically discussed with the result that more seems to speak for a freshwater origin. The two-step model with the genus Iberobathynella Schminke, 1973 as an example is scrutinized and found to be incomplete and until now not sufficiently supported.

Journal

CrustaceanaBrill

Published: Apr 16, 2014

References