FIELD'S NOMINALISTIC PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS

FIELD'S NOMINALISTIC PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS objects which are not accessible according to our currently acceptable epistemological views. But whilst it is widely believed that there is quite some scope for presenting rejoinders to this argument, e.g. by questioning the conceptions of semantics * Critical Discussion of of Hartry Field, Realism. Mathematics and Modality. Oxford: Basil Blackwe1l1989, viii + 289pp. 1. In what folIows, non-footnoted references are 10 essays reprinted in Realism. Mathematics and Modality and 10 the pagination of that volume. 2. Benacerraf (1973). 216 and epistemology which generate the problem, it could also be argued that we should first press further into the motivational account, to question the propriety and desirability of epistemological homogeneity. And this is the approach Field takes in his argument for mathematical nominalism; for Field tries to reconcile acceptance of Benacceraf's first condition with the, apparently incompatible, second condition of epistemological homogeneity by drawing the sting from that condition. He accepts that we have no epistemic access to the states of affairs which provide the truth conditions, but then argues that no access is required because mathematical statements should be construed as fictions. Hence although Field seriously questions the general import of the epistemological homogeneity thesis, he has http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Grazer Philosophische Studien Brill

FIELD'S NOMINALISTIC PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS

FIELD'S NOMINALISTIC PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS


objects which are not accessible according to our currently acceptable epistemological views. But whilst it is widely believed that there is quite some scope for presenting rejoinders to this argument, e.g. by questioning the conceptions of semantics * Critical Discussion of of Hartry Field, Realism. Mathematics and Modality. Oxford: Basil Blackwe1l1989, viii + 289pp. 1. In what folIows, non-footnoted references are 10 essays reprinted in Realism. Mathematics and Modality and 10 the pagination of that volume. 2. Benacerraf (1973). 216 and epistemology which generate the problem, it could also be argued that we should first press further into the motivational account, to question the propriety and desirability of epistemological homogeneity. And this is the approach Field takes in his argument for mathematical nominalism; for Field tries to reconcile acceptance of Benacceraf's first condition with the, apparently incompatible, second condition of epistemological homogeneity by drawing the sting from that condition. He accepts that we have no epistemic access to the states of affairs which provide the truth conditions, but then argues that no access is required because mathematical statements should be construed as fictions. Hence although Field seriously questions the general import of the epistemological homogeneity thesis, he has sympathies with the underlying assumption of that view - an antipathy to any non-realist conception of truth. Wishing to retain a generally realist (and physicalist) epistemology, he investigates the other horn of Benacerraf's dilemma by questioning the concept of mathematical knowledge itself, concluding that the price of epistemological homogeneity is the abandonment of the claim that we have knowledge of mathematical truths. One of the main objections to this conclusion is that to regard mathematical statements as wholly fictionalised discourse leaves it totally unclear how mathematics can fruitfully and intimately connect...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/field-s-nominalistic-philosophy-of-mathematics-9U1T5JWh3L
Publisher
BRILL
Copyright
© Copyright 1991 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0165-9227
eISSN
1875-6735
D.O.I.
10.1163/18756735-90000467
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

objects which are not accessible according to our currently acceptable epistemological views. But whilst it is widely believed that there is quite some scope for presenting rejoinders to this argument, e.g. by questioning the conceptions of semantics * Critical Discussion of of Hartry Field, Realism. Mathematics and Modality. Oxford: Basil Blackwe1l1989, viii + 289pp. 1. In what folIows, non-footnoted references are 10 essays reprinted in Realism. Mathematics and Modality and 10 the pagination of that volume. 2. Benacerraf (1973). 216 and epistemology which generate the problem, it could also be argued that we should first press further into the motivational account, to question the propriety and desirability of epistemological homogeneity. And this is the approach Field takes in his argument for mathematical nominalism; for Field tries to reconcile acceptance of Benacceraf's first condition with the, apparently incompatible, second condition of epistemological homogeneity by drawing the sting from that condition. He accepts that we have no epistemic access to the states of affairs which provide the truth conditions, but then argues that no access is required because mathematical statements should be construed as fictions. Hence although Field seriously questions the general import of the epistemological homogeneity thesis, he has

Journal

Grazer Philosophische StudienBrill

Published: Aug 13, 1991

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial