Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Three significant factors were lost to sight in the long drawn-out controversy which surrounded the St Pancras building: the Library’s rich and incom- parable resources of books and other printed mate- rial amassed over the centuries; its unsurpassed worldwide lending services (based at Boston Spa); and its advance into digital information at the sharp end of information technology. To Library insiders, St Pancras was only half the story. Boston Spa was overlooked by the academics, scholars and researchers of the Regular Readers Group, who were fighting the Library’s withdrawal from the Reading Room. To them the Reading Room was the British Library. They either did not, or chose not to, recognize that the British Library as consti- tuted far exceeded the old British Museum Library in its responsibilities. This perception of the Library spread to the House of Commons National Her- itage Committee as is evidenced by their recom- mendation that the Reading Room should be retained in perpetuity as an integral part of the British Library, ignoring the operational difficulties this would cause in order to pander to the cries of outrage from a minority pressure group reluctant to leave its cosy haven at Bloomsbury for the
Logos – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.