Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
410 self as "the anti-hero" (pp. 16-37). The opening lines of El. I, 10, where the description of the golden era is given a personal touch through the addition of tunc mihi vita foret, is rightly viewed in the same light by Bright (pp. 13 f.). The final chapter (chapter nine) is much briefer than the other chapters. It is devoted to a discussion of 'the shape of Books I and II' and it offers a lucid and convincing analysis of the logical structure and the interrelationship of the two books and the elegies they contain (pp. 260-268). Although one sometimes gets the impression that Bright's study, with the exception of the last chapter, is much more detailed than necessary, one cannot but value his book, which is written in a very lucid style, as an important contribution to a better under- standing of the specific qualities of Tibullus' poetry, of his "iso- lationism", "selfmytholizing", of the "irony" and "the subtle network of symbols in the structure of his poems". It is, however, somewhat curious that, in a book in which so much emphasis is put on internal development in a poet's oeuvre, the question of chronol- ogy
Mnemosyne – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1982
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.