Essaying the Mechanical Hypothesis: Descartes, La Forge, and Malebranche on the Formation of Birthmarks

Essaying the Mechanical Hypothesis: Descartes, La Forge, and Malebranche on the Formation of... © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2008 DOI: 10.1163/157338208X362688 Early Science and Medicine 13 (2008) 533-567 www.brill.nl/esm Essaying the Mechanical Hypothesis: Descartes, La Forge, and Malebranche on the Formation of Birthmarks Rebecca M. Wilkin * Pacific Lutheran University Tacoma, Washington Abstract This essay examines the determination by Cartesians to explain the maternal imagina- tion’s alleged role in the formation of birthmarks and the changing notion of monstros- ity. Cartesians saw the formation of birthmarks as a challenge through which to demonstrate the heuristic capacity of mechanism. Descartes claimed to be able to explain the transmission of a perception from the mother’s imagination to the fetus’ skin without having recourse to the little pictures postulated by his contemporaries. La Forge ofered a detailed account stating that the failure to explain the maternal imagination’s impressions would cast doubt on mechanism. Whereas both character- ized the birthmark as a deformation or monstrosity in miniature, Malebranche attrib- uted a role to the maternal imagination in fashioning family likenesses. However, he also charged the mother’s imagination with the transmission of original sin. Keywords birthmarks, formative faculty, maternal imagination, mechanism, monsters, optics, René Descartes, Louis de La Forge and Nicolas Malebranche In the first fragments http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Early Science and Medicine Brill

Essaying the Mechanical Hypothesis: Descartes, La Forge, and Malebranche on the Formation of Birthmarks

Early Science and Medicine, Volume 13 (6): 533 – Jan 1, 2008

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/essaying-the-mechanical-hypothesis-descartes-la-forge-and-malebranche-qqCRezP5UN
Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2008 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
1383-7427
eISSN
1573-3823
D.O.I.
10.1163/157338208X362688
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2008 DOI: 10.1163/157338208X362688 Early Science and Medicine 13 (2008) 533-567 www.brill.nl/esm Essaying the Mechanical Hypothesis: Descartes, La Forge, and Malebranche on the Formation of Birthmarks Rebecca M. Wilkin * Pacific Lutheran University Tacoma, Washington Abstract This essay examines the determination by Cartesians to explain the maternal imagina- tion’s alleged role in the formation of birthmarks and the changing notion of monstros- ity. Cartesians saw the formation of birthmarks as a challenge through which to demonstrate the heuristic capacity of mechanism. Descartes claimed to be able to explain the transmission of a perception from the mother’s imagination to the fetus’ skin without having recourse to the little pictures postulated by his contemporaries. La Forge ofered a detailed account stating that the failure to explain the maternal imagination’s impressions would cast doubt on mechanism. Whereas both character- ized the birthmark as a deformation or monstrosity in miniature, Malebranche attrib- uted a role to the maternal imagination in fashioning family likenesses. However, he also charged the mother’s imagination with the transmission of original sin. Keywords birthmarks, formative faculty, maternal imagination, mechanism, monsters, optics, René Descartes, Louis de La Forge and Nicolas Malebranche In the first fragments

Journal

Early Science and MedicineBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2008

Keywords: MECHANISM; NICOLAS MALEBRANCHE; FORMATIVE FACULTY; BIRTHMARKS; LOUIS DE LA FORGE; OPTICS; MONSTERS; RENÉ DESCARTES; MATERNAL IMAGINATION

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off