Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Á. Miklósi, R. Polgárdi, J. Topál, V. Csányi (1998)
Use of experimenter-given cues in dogsAnimal Cognition, 1
Brian Hare, J. Call, B. Agnetta, M. Tomasello (2000)
Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not seeAnimal Behaviour, 59
J. Call, M. Tomasello (2005)
What Chimpanzees Know about Seeing, Revisited: An Explanation of the Third Kind
M. Gácsi, Á. Miklósi, Orsolya Varga, J. Topál, V. Csányi (2004)
Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human’s attentionAnimal Cognition, 7
Brian Hare, Michelle Brown, C. Williamson, M. Tomasello (2002)
The Domestication of Social Cognition in DogsScience, 298
Juliane Kaminski, J. Call, M. Tomasello (2006)
Goats' behaviour in a competitive food paradigm: Evidence for perspective taking?Behaviour, 143
B. Osthaus, S. Lea, A. Slater (2004)
Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fail to show understanding of means-end connections in a string-pulling taskAnimal Cognition, 8
A. Tschudin, J. Call, Robin Dunbar, G. Harris, C. Elst (2001)
Comprehension of signs by dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).Journal of comparative psychology, 115 1
M. Scheumann, J. Call (2004)
The use of experimenter-given cues by South African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus)Animal Cognition, 7
N. Emery, N. Clayton (2004)
The Mentality of Crows: Convergent Evolution of Intelligence in Corvids and ApesScience, 306
T. Bugnyar, Mareike Stöwe, B. Heinrich (2004)
Ravens, Corvus corax, follow gaze direction of humans around obstaclesProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271
J. Riedel, Katrin Schumann, Juliane Kaminski, J. Call, M. Tomasello (2008)
The early ontogeny of human–dog communicationAnimal Behaviour, 75
J. Bräuer, Juliane Kaminski, J. Riedel, J. Call, M. Tomasello (2006)
Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, causal ape.Journal of comparative psychology, 120 1
Brian Hare, M. Tomasello (2005)
Human-like social skills in dogs?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9
Z. Viranyi, J. Topál, M. Gácsi, Á. Miklósi, V. Csányi (2004)
Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans’ attentional focusBehavioural Processes, 66
H. Frank, M. Frank (1985)
Comparative manipulation-test performance in ten-week-old wolves (Canis lupus) and Alaskan malamutes (Canis familiaris): A Piagetian interpretation.Journal of Comparative Psychology, 99
J. Burger, M. Gochfeld, B. Murray (1992)
Risk discrimination of eye contact and directness of approach in black Iguanas (Ctenosaura similis)Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106
Juliane Kaminski (2009)
Dogs (Canis familiaris) are Adapted to Receive Human Communication
Christine Schwab, L. Huber (2006)
Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners.Journal of comparative psychology, 120 3
Brian Hare, M. Tomasello (1999)
Domestic Dogs (Canis familiaris) Use Human and Conspecific Social Cues to Locate Hidden FoodJournal of Comparative Psychology, 113
Mark Xitco, John Gory, S. Kuczaj (2004)
Dolphin pointing is linked to the attentional behavior of a receiverAnimal Cognition, 7
Á. Miklósi, E. Kubinyi, J. Topál, M. Gácsi, Z. Viranyi, V. Csányi (2003)
A Simple Reason for a Big Difference Wolves Do Not Look Back at Humans, but Dogs DoCurrent Biology, 13
B. Osthaus, A. Slater, S. Lea (2003)
Can dogs defy gravity? A comparison with the human infant and a non‐human primateDevelopmental Science, 6
D. MacHugh, D. Bradley (2001)
Livestock genetic origins: Goats buck the trendProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98
B. Heinrich, J. Pepper (1998)
Influence of competitors on caching behaviour in the common raven,Corvus coraxAnimal Behaviour, 56
Z. Viranyi, J. Topál, Á. Miklósi, V. Csányi (2005)
A nonverbal test of knowledge attribution: a comparative study on dogs and childrenAnimal Cognition, 9
Brian Hare, J. Call, M. Tomasello (1998)
Communication of Food Location Between Human and Dog ( Canis Familiaris )Evolution of Communication, 2
H. Frank, M. Frank (1985)
Comparative manipulation-test performance in ten-week-old wolves (Canis lupus) and Alaskan malamutes (Canis familiaris): a piagetian interpretation
Brian Hare, J. Call, M. Tomasello (2001)
Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know?Animal Behaviour, 61
Joanna Dally, N. Emery, N. Clayton (2004)
Cache protection strategies by western scrub–jays (Aphelocoma californica): hiding food in the shadeProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271
Joanna Dally, N. Emery, N. Clayton (2006)
Food-Caching Western Scrub-Jays Keep Track of Who Was Watching WhenScience, 312
Brian Hare, E. Addessi, J. Call, M. Tomasello, E. Visalberghi (2003)
Do capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella, know what conspecifics do and do not see?Animal Behaviour, 65
Juliane Kaminski, J. Riedel, J. Call, M. Tomasello (2005)
Domestic goats, Capra hircus, follow gaze direction and use social cues in an object choice taskAnimal Behaviour, 69
Juliane Kaminski, J. Call, M. Tomasello (2004)
Body orientation and face orientation: two factors controlling apes’ begging behavior from humansAnimal Cognition, 7
N. Emery, N. Clayton (2001)
Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jaysNature, 414
B. Agnetta, Brian Hare, M. Tomasello (2000)
Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not useAnimal Cognition, 3
G. Burghardt, H. Greene (1988)
Predator simulation and duration of death feigning in neonate hognose snakesAnimal Behaviour, 36
J. Bräuer, J. Call, M. Tomasello (2007)
Chimpanzees really know what others can see in a competitive situationAnimal Cognition, 10
Henrike Moll, M. Tomasello (2004)
12- and 18-month-old infants follow gaze to spaces behind barriers.Developmental science, 7 1
J. Bräuer, J. Call, M. Tomasello (2004)
Visual perspective taking in dogs (Canis familiaris) in the presence of barriersApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 88
J. Call, J. Bräuer, Juliane Kaminski, M. Tomasello (2003)
Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans.Journal of comparative psychology, 117 3
Domestic dogs are sensitive to a human’s perspective Juliane Kaminski 1,2,3) , Juliane Bräuer 2) , Josep Call 2) & Michael Tomasello 2) ( 1 Sub Department of Animal Behaviour, University of Cambridge, High Street, Madingley, Cambridge, CB3 8AA, UK; 2 Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Deutscher Platz 6, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany) (Accepted: 20 November 2008) Summary We investigated dogs’ ability to take the visual perspective of humans. In the main study, each of two toys was placed on the dog’s side of two small barriers (one opaque, one transparent). In experimental conditions, a human sat on the opposite side of the barriers, such that she could see only the toy behind the transparent barrier. The experimenter then told the dog to ‘Bring it here!’ (without designating either toy in any way). In the Back Turned control E also sat on the opposite side but with her back turned so that she could see neither toy, and in the Same Side control she sat on the same side as the dog such that she could see both toys. When toys were differentiable dogs approached the toy behind the transparent barrier in experimental as compared to back turned
Behaviour – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2009
Keywords: PERSPECTIVE TAKING; SOCIAL COGNITION; DOGS
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.