Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Domestic Courts’ Structural Bias and the Reception of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Jurisprudence

Domestic Courts’ Structural Bias and the Reception of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’... Domestic Courts’ Structural Bias and the Reception of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Jurisprudence Caroline L Silva* I. Introduction Judicial behaviour and the particular bias on how judges decide is not new as a field of study. However, the field of international judicial behaviour has only arisen in the last decade, following the growth of jurisprudence by international courts. Erik Voeten has provided a version of this roadmap in Lecturer in the Discipline of Human Rights (incoming) at the Department of Political Science & Institute for the Study of Human Rights, Columbia University. I am thankful for the Postdoctoral Fellowship from Lichtenberg-Kolleg – The Göttingen Institute for Advanced Study (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen), which allowed me to prepare and submit this article for publication. I am also thankful for the comments that I received during the ESIL IGICT Annual Meet- ing 2020 on ‘Bias and International Adjudication’. In addition, I thank Matthias Koenig, Amandine Barb, Kathryn David, Gabriela Navarro, Patrick Barry and fellows from the Write Lab at the Max-Planck-Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity for their comments and help on revising this article and for Edit Nagy for her proofreading support. Moreover, Shai Dothan and Ian http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Austrian Review of International and European Law Online Brill

Domestic Courts’ Structural Bias and the Reception of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Jurisprudence

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/domestic-courts-structural-bias-and-the-reception-of-the-inter-803JB8ixch

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
eISSN
1573-6512
DOI
10.1163/15736512-02501006
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Domestic Courts’ Structural Bias and the Reception of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Jurisprudence Caroline L Silva* I. Introduction Judicial behaviour and the particular bias on how judges decide is not new as a field of study. However, the field of international judicial behaviour has only arisen in the last decade, following the growth of jurisprudence by international courts. Erik Voeten has provided a version of this roadmap in Lecturer in the Discipline of Human Rights (incoming) at the Department of Political Science & Institute for the Study of Human Rights, Columbia University. I am thankful for the Postdoctoral Fellowship from Lichtenberg-Kolleg – The Göttingen Institute for Advanced Study (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen), which allowed me to prepare and submit this article for publication. I am also thankful for the comments that I received during the ESIL IGICT Annual Meet- ing 2020 on ‘Bias and International Adjudication’. In addition, I thank Matthias Koenig, Amandine Barb, Kathryn David, Gabriela Navarro, Patrick Barry and fellows from the Write Lab at the Max-Planck-Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity for their comments and help on revising this article and for Edit Nagy for her proofreading support. Moreover, Shai Dothan and Ian

Journal

Austrian Review of International and European Law OnlineBrill

Published: Jul 12, 2022

There are no references for this article.