De Diego Nafría v. Spain

De Diego Nafría v. Spain    [  ] DE DIEGO NAFRÍA v. SPAIN Right to free expression – no violation Article 10 The Spanish courts had weighed the conflicting interests against each other for the purposes of domes- tic law before concluding that the applicant, a senior official at the Bank of Spain, had overstepped the acceptable limits of the right to criticise. In a judgment delivered on  March  in the case of De Diego Nafría v. Spain , the European Court of Human Rights held by five votes to two that there had not been a violation of Article  (right to free expression) of the European Conven- tion on Human Rights. This judgment is not final. Pursuant to Article  , Section  of the Convention, within three months from the date of the judgment of a Chamber, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber.  . Principal facts The applicant, Mariano de Diego Nafría, is a Spanish national who was born in  and lives in Madrid. The applicant was formerly an inspector at the Bank of Spain. The application concerns his dismissal http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Human Rights Case Digest Brill

De Diego Nafría v. Spain

Human Rights Case Digest , Volume 13 (3-4): 245 – Jan 1, 2002

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/de-diego-nafr-a-v-spain-WUMJviL7y0
Publisher
Martinus Nijhoff
Copyright
© 2002 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0965-934X
eISSN
1571-8131
D.O.I.
10.1163/157181302761416115
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

   [  ] DE DIEGO NAFRÍA v. SPAIN Right to free expression – no violation Article 10 The Spanish courts had weighed the conflicting interests against each other for the purposes of domes- tic law before concluding that the applicant, a senior official at the Bank of Spain, had overstepped the acceptable limits of the right to criticise. In a judgment delivered on  March  in the case of De Diego Nafría v. Spain , the European Court of Human Rights held by five votes to two that there had not been a violation of Article  (right to free expression) of the European Conven- tion on Human Rights. This judgment is not final. Pursuant to Article  , Section  of the Convention, within three months from the date of the judgment of a Chamber, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber.  . Principal facts The applicant, Mariano de Diego Nafría, is a Spanish national who was born in  and lives in Madrid. The applicant was formerly an inspector at the Bank of Spain. The application concerns his dismissal

Journal

Human Rights Case DigestBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2002

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off