© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2011 DOI: 10.1163/187226311X582338 Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2011) 230–260 brill.nl/jph Collingwood and Weber vs. Mink: History after the Cognitive Turn Stephen Turner Department of Philosophy, University of South Florida email@example.com Abstract Louis Mink wrote a classic study of R. G. Collingwood that led to his most impor- tant contribution to the philosophy of history, his account of narrative. Central to this account was the non-detachability thesis, that facts became historical facts through incorporation into narratives, and the thesis that narratives were not comparable to the facts or to one another. His book on Collingwood was critical of Collingwood’s idea that there were facts in history that we get through self- knowledge but which are nevertheless objective, his account of re-enactment, and his notion of absolute presuppositions. It is illuminating to compare Collingwood to Weber with respect to these puzzling arguments, for the same issues arise there in diﬀerent form. Recent work in social neuroscience on mirroring allows a diﬀer- ent approach to these puzzles: mirror system “knowledge” of others and simula- tion ﬁt, respectively, with Weber’s idea of direct observational understanding and Collingwood’s re-enactment account. This account allows for the
Journal of the Philosophy of History – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2011
Keywords: Weber; Verstehen; mirror system; Mink; Collingwood
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera