* Thanks are owed to Professor Barbara Kwiatkowska, former Deputy-Director of the Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea at Utrecht University and losc Independent Consultant, for her recommendations. All the errors are the author’s own. Funding: The article was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and the Research Funds of Renmin University of China.IntroductionOn 21 June 2013, the Annex vii arbitral tribunal in The Philippines v. China was established1 to conduct the compulsory arbitral procedure instituted by the Philippines, on 22 January 2013, under Part xv, Section 2, Annex vii of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (hereinafter losc)2 in respect of the dispute over maritime entitlements to the South China Sea. In contrast with prior Annex vii procedures, the present procedure has at least three landmark features. First, it is the first time that the People’s Republic of China has been brought to an inter-state arbitration since its foundation, and only the second time in history that China has been sued under international legal procedures. On 25 November 1926, China was sued before the Permanent Court of International Justice (pcij) by Belgium on the grounds of China’s
The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law – Brill
Published: Feb 19, 2015
Keywords: China’s informal participation; Annex vii arbitral tribunal; informal communication; informal appearance; jurisdiction
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.
Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera