Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Challenges to Justice at Home: The Domestic Prosecution of Efrain Rios Montt

Challenges to Justice at Home: The Domestic Prosecution of Efrain Rios Montt In March 2013, at the age of 89, Efraín Ríos Montt became the first former head of state to ever be convicted of genocide by a national tribunal. After prior failed attempts to try him for this crime, his conviction to 80 years in prison was hailed as a victory both in Guatemala and abroad. Just ten days later, Guatemala’s Constitutional Court annulled the verdict and ordered a second trial. Having since been deemed mentally unfit to stand for trial, he will be tried in a closed quarters special proceeding in January 2016, but if found guilty, will not be sentenced. This article explains why Guatemalan national courts tried the case against Ríos Montt, and discusses the historical factors that led to the trial, questioning whether they are replicable in other countries. It argues that the necessary elements for a successful implementation of that conviction were present in Guatemala, but suggests that the political climate was inadequately negotiated in order to prevent the subsequent annulment of the verdict. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Criminal Law Review Brill

Challenges to Justice at Home: The Domestic Prosecution of Efrain Rios Montt

Robinson, Alicia
International Criminal Law Review , Volume 16 (1): 31 – Feb 5, 2016
Download PDF
31 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/challenges-to-justice-at-home-the-domestic-prosecution-of-efrain-rios-LI4GE5Gb1J

References (1)

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
1567-536X
eISSN
1571-8123
DOI
10.1163/15718123-01601001
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In March 2013, at the age of 89, Efraín Ríos Montt became the first former head of state to ever be convicted of genocide by a national tribunal. After prior failed attempts to try him for this crime, his conviction to 80 years in prison was hailed as a victory both in Guatemala and abroad. Just ten days later, Guatemala’s Constitutional Court annulled the verdict and ordered a second trial. Having since been deemed mentally unfit to stand for trial, he will be tried in a closed quarters special proceeding in January 2016, but if found guilty, will not be sentenced. This article explains why Guatemalan national courts tried the case against Ríos Montt, and discusses the historical factors that led to the trial, questioning whether they are replicable in other countries. It argues that the necessary elements for a successful implementation of that conviction were present in Guatemala, but suggests that the political climate was inadequately negotiated in order to prevent the subsequent annulment of the verdict.

Journal

International Criminal Law Review – Brill

Published: Feb 5, 2016

There are no references for this article.