118 J OURNAL OF M ORAL P HILOSOPHY 3.1 (2006) who have lives worth not living than to add individuals who have lives worth living (but just below v ). Broome seems prepared to accept this conclusion (p. 213), but— to me at least—it seems worse than the standard version of the repugnant conclu- sion, where v =0. After all, the worst-off individuals referred to in the sadistic con- clusion can truly say that they have lives that are much worse for them than zero lives (I would add that their lives are much worse for them than non-existence, but Broome is sceptical with respect to the importance of this claim), whereas the better-off individuals can truly say that they have good lives (lives worth living)— perhaps very good lives, depending on the exact location of v . In the standard version of the repugnant conclusion, on the other hand, the worse-off individuals all have lives worth living and we can see how the goodness of their lives might add up to an outcome that is better than the less populated outcome. (Broome also suggests that the vagueness of the neutral level may render both the repugnant and
Journal of Moral Philosophy – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2006
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.
Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera