Book Review: Ethics Without Principles

Book Review: Ethics Without Principles 118 J OURNAL OF M ORAL P HILOSOPHY 3.1 (2006) who have lives worth not living than to add individuals who have lives worth living (but just below v ). Broome seems prepared to accept this conclusion (p. 213), but— to me at least—it seems worse than the standard version of the repugnant conclu- sion, where v =0. After all, the worst-off individuals referred to in the sadistic con- clusion can truly say that they have lives that are much worse for them than zero lives (I would add that their lives are much worse for them than non-existence, but Broome is sceptical with respect to the importance of this claim), whereas the better-off individuals can truly say that they have good lives (lives worth living)— perhaps very good lives, depending on the exact location of v . In the standard version of the repugnant conclusion, on the other hand, the worse-off individuals all have lives worth living and we can see how the goodness of their lives might add up to an outcome that is better than the less populated outcome. (Broome also suggests that the vagueness of the neutral level may render both the repugnant and http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Moral Philosophy Brill

Book Review: Ethics Without Principles

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/book-review-ethics-without-principles-44MXZi3kmo
Publisher
BRILL
Copyright
© 2006 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
1740-4681
eISSN
1745-5243
D.O.I.
10.1177/174046810600300116
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

118 J OURNAL OF M ORAL P HILOSOPHY 3.1 (2006) who have lives worth not living than to add individuals who have lives worth living (but just below v ). Broome seems prepared to accept this conclusion (p. 213), but— to me at least—it seems worse than the standard version of the repugnant conclu- sion, where v =0. After all, the worst-off individuals referred to in the sadistic con- clusion can truly say that they have lives that are much worse for them than zero lives (I would add that their lives are much worse for them than non-existence, but Broome is sceptical with respect to the importance of this claim), whereas the better-off individuals can truly say that they have good lives (lives worth living)— perhaps very good lives, depending on the exact location of v . In the standard version of the repugnant conclusion, on the other hand, the worse-off individuals all have lives worth living and we can see how the goodness of their lives might add up to an outcome that is better than the less populated outcome. (Broome also suggests that the vagueness of the neutral level may render both the repugnant and

Journal

Journal of Moral PhilosophyBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2006

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial