Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>International criminal courts and tribunals regularly face difficulties in obtaining cooperation from States, a stumbling block that hinders the process of bringing criminals to justice and trying them before a court of law. In doing so, States can be held accountable under the rules of state responsibility. This possibility was raised in key decisions and scholarly texts on the issue. This paper seeks to expand the discussion on the matter and analyze the responsibility of States for their failure to cooperate with international courts. Additionally, this paper suggests amendments to the ICC Rome Statute to strengthen the judicial assistance regime, considering that this court is designed to become the permanent court dealing with war crimes and crimes against humanity and that a review of the Statute is to take place in May or June 2010.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
International Criminal Law Review – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2010
Keywords: DRAFT ARTICLES ON THE RESPONSIBILITY OF STATES FOR WRONGFUL ACTS; COUNTER-MEASURES; INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA; ERGA OMNES; OBLIGATIONS; INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (ICT), INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA; JUS COGENS; STATE COOPERATION
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.