Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

ARIUS DIDYMUS AND LUKE-ACTS

ARIUS DIDYMUS AND LUKE-ACTS ARIUS DIDYMUS AND LUKE - ACTS by CHRISTOPH HEIL D-96045 Bamberg For James M. Robinson * 1. Introduction 1 In Acts 1:1-2, Luke summarizes the contents of his Ž rst book ( tòn m¢n prÇton lñgon ), but in the following, he fails to give a description of his second book, which is unusual according to ancient conven- tions. 2 E. Norden conjectured the following description of the book of Acts which originally would have followed Acts 1:2, * J.M. Robinson, “the doyen of modern Q studies” (G. Stanton, Gospel Truth? New Light on Jesus and the Gospels [ Valley Forge, PA 1995] 75), has continuously emphasized the importance of Religionsgeschichte , Formgeschichte and Redaktionsgeschichte regarding “the quest for Q”. Cf. J.M. Robinson, “Theological Autobiography,” in The Craft of Religious Studies , ed. J.R. Stone (London-New York 1998) 117-150, 140-141. It is the recon- struction of Q in which Jim has invested most of his energy in recent years. Cf. ibid. , 138-149 and especially Documenta Q: Reconstructions of Q Through Two Centuries of Gospel Research. Excerpted, Sorted and Evaluated , eds. J.M. Robinson et al. (Leuven 1996 Ú .; more than 30 volumes are planned); J.M. Robinson http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Novum Testamentum Brill

ARIUS DIDYMUS AND LUKE-ACTS

Novum Testamentum , Volume 42 (4): 358 – Jan 1, 2000

Loading next page...
1
 
/lp/brill/arius-didymus-and-luke-acts-RrcBk2012Y

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2000 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0048-1009
eISSN
1568-5365
DOI
10.1163/156853600506744
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ARIUS DIDYMUS AND LUKE - ACTS by CHRISTOPH HEIL D-96045 Bamberg For James M. Robinson * 1. Introduction 1 In Acts 1:1-2, Luke summarizes the contents of his Ž rst book ( tòn m¢n prÇton lñgon ), but in the following, he fails to give a description of his second book, which is unusual according to ancient conven- tions. 2 E. Norden conjectured the following description of the book of Acts which originally would have followed Acts 1:2, * J.M. Robinson, “the doyen of modern Q studies” (G. Stanton, Gospel Truth? New Light on Jesus and the Gospels [ Valley Forge, PA 1995] 75), has continuously emphasized the importance of Religionsgeschichte , Formgeschichte and Redaktionsgeschichte regarding “the quest for Q”. Cf. J.M. Robinson, “Theological Autobiography,” in The Craft of Religious Studies , ed. J.R. Stone (London-New York 1998) 117-150, 140-141. It is the recon- struction of Q in which Jim has invested most of his energy in recent years. Cf. ibid. , 138-149 and especially Documenta Q: Reconstructions of Q Through Two Centuries of Gospel Research. Excerpted, Sorted and Evaluated , eds. J.M. Robinson et al. (Leuven 1996 Ú .; more than 30 volumes are planned); J.M. Robinson

Journal

Novum TestamentumBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.