Adorno contra Habermas: The Claims of Critical Theory as Immanent Critique

Adorno contra Habermas: The Claims of Critical Theory as Immanent Critique Historical Materialism , volume 13:4 (79–120) © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2005 Also available online – www.brill.nl 1 Finlayson 2003; Cook 2003. Fotini Vaki Adorno contra Habermas: The Claims of Critical Theory as Immanent Critique The present paper was to a major extent stimulated by the genuinely fruitful debate between Deborah Cook and Gordon Finlayson in Historical Materialism . 1 The debate was about whether it is Habermas’s or Adorno’s version of the theory of modernity that can make the stronger claim as a critical theory of society. More specifically, the crucial question at issue is whether it is Habermas’s theory of modernity in terms of the rationalisation of the lifeworld, or Adorno’s appropriation and reformulation of the Hegelian concept of determinate negation (which constitutes the core of his Negative Dialectics ) that can grasp society from the viewpoint of its possible transformation, through a historically specific theory of social constitution. Arguing that Habermas already applauds the realisation of reason in contemporary society in his work, Between Facts and Norms , legitimating thereby the existent state of affairs and rendering social criticism superfluous, Deborah Cook turns to the Adornian arsenal of dialectical concepts such as contradiction HIMA 13,4_323_f3_79-120III http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Historical Materialism Brill

Adorno contra Habermas: The Claims of Critical Theory as Immanent Critique

Historical Materialism, Volume 13 (4): 79 – Jan 1, 2005

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/adorno-contra-habermas-the-claims-of-critical-theory-as-immanent-5VJ5AclyX7
Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2005 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
1465-4466
eISSN
1569-206X
D.O.I.
10.1163/156920605774857521
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Historical Materialism , volume 13:4 (79–120) © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2005 Also available online – www.brill.nl 1 Finlayson 2003; Cook 2003. Fotini Vaki Adorno contra Habermas: The Claims of Critical Theory as Immanent Critique The present paper was to a major extent stimulated by the genuinely fruitful debate between Deborah Cook and Gordon Finlayson in Historical Materialism . 1 The debate was about whether it is Habermas’s or Adorno’s version of the theory of modernity that can make the stronger claim as a critical theory of society. More specifically, the crucial question at issue is whether it is Habermas’s theory of modernity in terms of the rationalisation of the lifeworld, or Adorno’s appropriation and reformulation of the Hegelian concept of determinate negation (which constitutes the core of his Negative Dialectics ) that can grasp society from the viewpoint of its possible transformation, through a historically specific theory of social constitution. Arguing that Habermas already applauds the realisation of reason in contemporary society in his work, Between Facts and Norms , legitimating thereby the existent state of affairs and rendering social criticism superfluous, Deborah Cook turns to the Adornian arsenal of dialectical concepts such as contradiction HIMA 13,4_323_f3_79-120III

Journal

Historical MaterialismBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2005

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off