A consultation by Andrea Alciato on the laws of war

A consultation by Andrea Alciato on the laws of war In 1550, Andrea Alciato wrote a consilium concerning a case in the Reichskammergericht , one of the so–called Reformationsprozesse , between Henry II (the Younger), Duke of Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel, on the one hand, and the town of Goslar, together with the leaders of the Schmalkaldic League on the other. In the first question of this consilium , Alciato argues in favour of the Emperor’s legislative supremacy over the Reichskammer­gericht . In three other questions, he uses feudal law along with the ius commune . Alciato concludes that the Duke’s lands belong to the victors, that his children cannot be deprived of their father’s fiefs and that the League is under an obligation to sequester these. It can be seen that Alciato is legitimating the absolutism of Charles V and that some of his sources are cited for their authoritative nature rather than because they correspond with the political reality. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Legal History Review / Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'Histoire du Droit Brill

A consultation by Andrea Alciato on the laws of war

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/a-consultation-by-andrea-alciato-on-the-laws-of-war-0nDYDlkj6F
Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0040-7585
eISSN
1571-8190
DOI
10.1163/15718190-08212p08
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In 1550, Andrea Alciato wrote a consilium concerning a case in the Reichskammergericht , one of the so–called Reformationsprozesse , between Henry II (the Younger), Duke of Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel, on the one hand, and the town of Goslar, together with the leaders of the Schmalkaldic League on the other. In the first question of this consilium , Alciato argues in favour of the Emperor’s legislative supremacy over the Reichskammer­gericht . In three other questions, he uses feudal law along with the ius commune . Alciato concludes that the Duke’s lands belong to the victors, that his children cannot be deprived of their father’s fiefs and that the League is under an obligation to sequester these. It can be seen that Alciato is legitimating the absolutism of Charles V and that some of his sources are cited for their authoritative nature rather than because they correspond with the political reality.

Journal

The Legal History Review / Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'Histoire du DroitBrill

Published: Oct 23, 2014

Keywords: Holy Roman Empire (constitution of the –––) ; Emperor’s supremacy ; sovereignty ; Reichsstände ; Reichskammergericht ; ius gentium ; ius commune ; consilia ; feudal law

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off