Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A number of inadequacies of existing implementation techniques for extending Java™ with parametric polymorphism are revealed. Homogeneous translations are the most space-efficient but they are not compatible with reflection, some models of persistence, and multiple dispatch. Heterogeneous translations, on the other hand, can potentially produce large amounts of redundant information. Implementation techniques that address these concerns are developed. In languages that support run-time reflection, an adequate implementation of parametric, bounded and F-bounded polymorphism is shown to require (reflective) run-time support. In Java, extensions to the core classes are needed. This is in spite of the fact that parametric polymorphism is intended to be managed statically .
ACM SIGPLAN Notices – Association for Computing Machinery
Published: Oct 1, 1998
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.