Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Löhner, E. Oñate (2004)
A general advancing front technique for filling space with arbitrary objectsInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 61
V. Bayona, N. Flyer, G. Lucas, A. Baumgaertner (2015)
A 3-D RBF-FD solver for modeling the atmospheric global electric circuit with topography (GEC-RBFFD v1.0)Geoscientific Model Development, 8
(2018)
Information Technology Co
Marcin Kalicinski (2011)
RapidXmlRetrieved from https://github.com/c42f/tinyformat.
D. Oanh, O. Davydov, H. Phu (2016)
Adaptive RBF-FD method for elliptic problems with point singularities in 2DAppl. Math. Comput., 313
Peng Wang, Yonghao Zhang, Zhaoli Guo (2017)
Numerical study of three-dimensional natural convection in a cubical cavity at high Rayleigh numbersInternational Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 113
(1999)
Node generation scheme for meshfree method by Voronoi diagram and weighted bubble packing
W. Bangerth, R. Hartmann, G. Kanschat (2007)
deal.II—A general-purpose object-oriented finite element libraryACM Trans. Math. Softw., 33
G. Kosec, J. Slak, M. Depolli, R. Trobec, Kyvia Pereira, S. Tomar, Thibault Jacquemin, S. Bordas, M. Wahab (2019)
Weak and strong from meshless methods for linear elastic problem under fretting contact conditionsTribology International
A. Crespo, J. Dominguez, B. Rogers, M. Gómez-Gesteira, S. Longshaw, R. Canelas, R. Vacondio, A. Barreiro, O. García-Feal (2015)
DualSPHysics: Open-source parallel CFD solver based on Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH)Comput. Phys. Commun., 187
D. Levin (1998)
The approximation power of moving least-squaresMath. Comput., 67
(2019)
Compiler explorer
N. Flyer, B. Fornberg, V. Bayona, G. Barnett (2016)
On the role of polynomials in RBF-FD approximations: I. Interpolation and accuracyJ. Comput. Phys., 321
M. Maksi, V. Djuricaa, A. Souventa, J. Slakb, M. Depollib, G. Kosecb (2019)
Cooling of overhead power lines due to the natural convection
J. Buchler (1990)
The Numerical Modelling of Nonlinear Stellar Pulsations
V. Bayona, N. Flyer, B. Fornberg, G. Barnett (2017)
On the role of polynomials in RBF-FD approximations: II. Numerical solution of elliptic PDEsJ. Comput. Phys., 332
H. Wendland (2004)
Scattered Data Approximation
OneZero Software (2008)
FluidixRetrieved from https://www.fluidix.ca/.
Luca Bertagna, Simone Deparis, Luca Formaggia, Davide Forti, Alessandro Veneziani (2017)
The LifeV library: Engineering mathematics beyond the proof of conceptarXiv preprint arXiv:1710.06596 (2017).
(2016)
SPlisHSPlasH
H. Sadat, S. Couturier (2000)
PERFORMANCE AND ACCURACY OF A MESHLESS METHOD FOR LAMINAR NATURAL CONVECTIONNumerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals, 37
(2014)
Radial Basis Function Finite Differences on the GPU
(2014)
nanoflann: A C++ header-only fork of FLANN, a library for Nearest Neighbor (NN) with KD-trees
J. Slak, G. Kosec (2018)
On generation of node distributions for meshless PDE discretizationsArXiv, abs/1812.03160
M. Robinson, M. Bruna (2017)
Particle-based and Meshless Methods with AboriaSoftwareX, 6
H. Munthe-Kaas, M. Haveraaen (1996)
Coordinate free numerics: Closing the gap between “pure” and ‘applied” mathematicsZAMM Z. angew. Math. Mech, 76
Florian Rathgeber, D. Ham, L. Mitchell, Michael Lange, F. Luporini, Andrew McRae, Gheorghe-Teodor Bercea, G. Markall, P. Kelly (2015)
FiredrakeACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 43
V. Bayona, M. Moscoso, M. Carretero, M. Kindelan (2010)
RBF-FD formulas and convergence propertiesJ. Comput. Phys., 229
(2015)
RBF: Python package containing the tools necessary for radial basis function (RBF) applications
A. Logg, G. Wells (2010)
DOLFIN: Automated finite element computingACM Trans. Math. Softw., 37
G. Kosec (2016)
A local numerical solution of a fluid-flow problem on an irregular domainAdv. Eng. Softw., 120
Inpartik & ITM University of Stuttgart (2008)
PasimodoRetrieved from https://www.itm.uni-stuttgart.de/en/software/pasimodo/.
Guirong Liu (2002)
Mesh Free Methods: Moving Beyond the Finite Element Method
W. Benz (1990)
Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics: A Review
S. Tiwari, J. Kuhnert (2003)
Finite Pointset Method Based on the Projection Method for Simulations of the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations
K. Ahnert, M. Mulansky (2011)
Odeint - Solving ordinary differential equations in C++ArXiv, abs/1110.3397
A. Tolstykh, D. Shirobokov (2003)
On using radial basis functions in a “finite difference mode” with applications to elasticity problemsComputational Mechanics, 33
Y. Liu, Y. Nie, Weiwei Zhang, Lei Wang (2010)
Node Placement Method by Bubble Simulation and Its ApplicationCmes-computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 55
J. Slak, G. Kosec (2019)
Refined Meshless Local Strong Form solution of Cauchy–Navier equation on an irregular domainEngineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
S. Milewski (2013)
Selected computational aspects of the meshless finite difference methodNumerical Algorithms, 63
Prabhu Ramachandran, Kunal Puri, Aditya Bhosale, A. Dinesh, Abhinav Muta, Pawan Negi, Rahul Govind, Suraj Sanka, Pankaj Pandey, Chandrashekhar Kaushik et al (2019)
PySPH: A Python-based framework for smoothed particle hydrodynamicsarXiv preprint arXiv:1909.04504 (2019).
Varun Shankar, R. Kirby, A. Fogelson (2018)
Robust Node Generation for Meshfree Discretizations on Irregular Domains and SurfacesArXiv, abs/1806.02972
Cheng-An Wang, H. Sadat, C. Prax (2012)
A new meshless approach for three dimensional fluid flow and related heat transfer problemsComputers & Fluids, 69
Yo-Ming Hsieh, Maodong Pan (2014)
ESFM: An Essential Software Framework for Meshfree MethodsAdv. Eng. Softw., 76
Vinh Nguyen, T. Rabczuk, S. Bordas, M. Duflot (2008)
Meshless methods: A review and computer implementation aspectsMath. Comput. Simul., 79
L. Gavete, M. Gavete, J. Benito (2003)
Improvements of generalized finite difference method and comparison with other meshless methodApplied Mathematical Modelling, 27
(2012)
Abaqus Unified FEA
M. Schaller, P. Gonnet, A. Chalk, P. Draper (2018)
SWIFT: SPH With Inter-dependent Fine-grained Tasking
(2010)
Eigenv3
Ltd
MIDAS Information Technology Comidas MeshFree. Retrieved from http://www.midasmeshfree.com/.
J. Slak, G. Kosec (2018)
Parallel coordinate free implementation of local meshless method2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)
(2018)
n.d.]. MESHFREE. https://www.meshfree.eu
Hua Li, S. Mulay (2013)
Meshless Methods and Their Numerical Properties
P. Suchde, J. Kuhnert (2018)
A meshfree generalized finite difference method for surface PDEsComput. Math. Appl., 78
F. Hecht (2012)
New development in freefem++, 20
(2011)
tinyformat: Minimal, type safe printf replacement library for C++
T. Fusegi, J. Hyun, K. Kuwahara, B. Farouk (1991)
A numerical study of three-dimensional natural convection in a differentially heated cubical enclosureInternational Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 34
Y. Renard, K. Poulios (2020)
GetFEM: Automated FE Modeling of Multiphysics Problems Based on a Generic Weak Form LanguageACM Trans. Math. Softw., 47
Kiera Sande, B. Fornberg (2019)
Fast variable density 3-D node generationSIAM J. Sci. Comput., 43
(1999)
MESHFREE
P. Ramachandran, K. Puri, Aditya Bhosale, A. Dinesh, Abhinav Muta, P. Negi, R. Govind, Suraj Sanka, Pankaj Pandey, Chandrashekhar Kaushik, Anshuman Kumar, Ananyo Sen, Rohan Kaushik, Mrinalgouda Patil, Deep Tavker, Dileep Menon, V. Kurapati, Amal Sebastian, A. Dutt, A. Agarwal (2019)
PySPH: A Python-based Framework for Smoothed Particle HydrodynamicsACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 47
Varun Shankar, A. Fogelson (2018)
Hyperviscosity-Based Stabilization for Radial Basis Function-Finite Difference (RBF-FD) Discretizations of Advection-Diffusion EquationsJournal of computational physics, 372
B. Fornberg, N. Flyer (2015)
Fast generation of 2-D node distributions for mesh-free PDE discretizationsComput. Math. Appl., 69
Alan C. Hindmarsh, Peter N. Brown, Keith E. Grant, Steven L. Lee, Radu Serban, Dan E. Shumaker, Carol S. Woodward (2005)
SUNDIALS: Suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solversACM Trans. Math. Softw., 31
R. Zamolo, E. Nobile (2018)
Two algorithms for fast 2D node generation: Application to RBF meshless discretization of diffusion problems and image halftoningComput. Math. Appl., 75
E. Oñate, F. Perazzo, J. Miquel (2001)
A finite point method for elasticity problemsComputers & Structures, 79
H. Munthe-Kaas, M. Heveraaen (1996)
Coordinate free numerics : Closing the gap between 'pure' and 'applied' mathematics ?Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 76
M. Folk, G. Heber, Q. Koziol, Elena Pourmal, Dana Robinson (2011)
An overview of the HDF5 technology suite and its applications
NOGRID GmbH. (2006)
NOGRIDRetrieved from https://www.nogrid.com/.
(2011)
RapidXml. Retrieved from https://github.com/c42f/tinyformat
Luca Bertagna, S. Deparis, L. Formaggia, D. Forti, A. Veneziani (2017)
The LifeV library: engineering mathematics beyond the proof of conceptarXiv: Numerical Analysis
C. Drumm, S. Tiwari, J. Kuhnert, H. Bart (2008)
Finite pointset method for simulation of the liquid-liquid flow field in an extractorComput. Chem. Eng., 32
Argyrios Petras, Leevan Ling, Steven Ruuth (2018)
An RBF-FD closest point method for solving PDEs on surfacesJ. Comput. Phys., 370
G. Kosec, B. Šarler (2008)
Solution of thermo‐fluid problems by collocation with local pressure correctionInternational Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 18
(2015)
SPH-flow
D. Gardner, D. Reynolds, C. Woodward, C. Balos (2020)
Enabling New Flexibility in the SUNDIALS Suite of Nonlinear and Differential/Algebraic Equation SolversACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 48
Medusa, a novel library for implementation of non-particle strong form mesh-free methods, such as GFDM or RBF-FD, is described. We identify and present common parts and patterns among many such methods reported in the literature, such as node positioning, stencil selection, and stencil weight computation. Many different algorithms exist for each part and the possible combinations offer a plethora of possibilities for improvements of solution procedures that are far from fully understood. As a consequence there are still many unanswered questions in the mesh-free community resulting in vivid ongoing research in the field. Medusa implements the core mesh-free elements as independent blocks, which offers users great flexibility in experimenting with the method they are developing, as well as easily comparing it with other existing methods. The article describes the chosen abstractions and their usage, illustrates aspects of the philosophy and design, offers some executions time benchmarks and demonstrates the application of the library on cases from linear elasticity and fluid flow in irregular 2D and 3D domains.
ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) – Association for Computing Machinery
Published: Jun 26, 2021
Keywords: PDE
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.