Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Zhongbao Kou, Changshui Zhang (2003)
Reply networks on a bulletin board system.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics, 67 3 Pt 2
S. Whittaker, L. Terveen, W. Hill, Lynn Cherny (1998)
The dynamics of mass interaction
WWW 2007 / Track: E*-Applications Session: E-Communities Expertise Networks in Online Communities: Structure and Algorithms
Qi Su, Dmitry Pavlov, Jyh-Herng Chow, W. Baker (2007)
Internet-scale collection of human-reviewed data
Jun Zhang, M. Ackerman, Lada Adamic (2007)
CommunityNetSimulator: Using Simulations to Study Online Community Networks
E. Wenger (1998)
Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity
Todd Holloway, M. Bozicevic, K. Börner (2005)
Analyzing and visualizing the semantic coverage of Wikipedia and its authorsArXiv, abs/cs/0512085
D. Engelbart, Jeff Ruilifson (1999)
Bootstrapping our collective intelligenceACM Comput. Surv., 31
Warren Sack (2000)
Conversation map: a content-based Usenet newsgroup browser
Eugene Agichtein, C. Castillo, D. Donato, A. Gionis, G. Mishne (2008)
Finding high-quality content in social media
R. Milo, S. Itzkovitz, N. Kashtan, Reuven Levitt, S. Shen-Orr, Inbal Ayzenshtat, Michal Sheffer, U. Alon (2004)
Superfamilies of Evolved and Designed NetworksScience, 303
E. Hippel, K. Lakhani (2000)
How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance?MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper Series
Howard Welser, Eric Gleave, Danyel Fisher, Marc Smith (2007)
Visualizing the Signatures of Social Roles in Online Discussion GroupsJ. Soc. Struct., 8
J. Preece, B. Nonnecke, D. Andrews (2004)
The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyoneComput. Hum. Behav., 20
M. Bradley (2000)
Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They KnowNew Library World, 101
(2006)
Web searches go low-tech: You ask, a person answers
Jaime Arguello, B. Butler, Elisabeth Joyce, R. Kraut, Kimberly Ling, C. Rosé, Xiaoqing Wang (2006)
Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communitiesProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
J. Donath (1998)
Identity and deception in the virtual community
B. Butler (2001)
Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social StructuresInf. Syst. Res., 12
Elisabeth Joyce, R. Kraut (2006)
Predicting Continued Participation in NewsgroupsJ. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 11
Danyel Fisher, Marc Smith, Howard Welser (2006)
You Are Who You Talk To: Detecting Roles in Usenet NewsgroupsProceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06), 3
E. Wenger (1998)
Communities of practice: Learning
S. Wernicke, Florian Rasche (2006)
FANMOD: a tool for fast network motif detectionBioinformatics, 22 9
R. Milo, S. Shen-Orr, S. Itzkovitz, N. Kashtan, D. Chklovskii, U. Alon (2002)
Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks.Science, 298 5594
T. Turner, Marc Smith, Danyel Fisher, Howard Welser (2005)
Picturing Usenet: Mapping Computer-Mediated Collective ActionJ. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 10
Soojung Kim, J. Oh, Sanghee Oh (2008)
Best-answer selection criteria in a social Q&A site from the user-oriented relevance perspective
WWW 2008 / Refereed Track: Social Networks & Web 2.0 - Analysis of Social Networks & Online Interaction Knowledge Sharing and Yahoo Answers: Everyone Knows Something Lada A. Adamic1 , Jun Zhang1 , Eytan Bakshy1 , Mark S. Ackerman1,2 {ladamic,junzh,ebakshy,ackerm}@umich.edu ABSTRACT Yahoo Answers (YA) is a large and diverse question-answer forum, acting not only as a medium for sharing technical knowledge, but as a place where one can seek advice, gather opinions, and satisfy one s curiosity about a countless number of things. In this paper, we seek to understand YA s knowledge sharing activity. We analyze the forum categories and cluster them according to content characteristics and patterns of interaction among the users. While interactions in some categories resemble expertise sharing forums, others incorporate discussion, everyday advice, and support. With such a diversity of categories in which one can participate, we nd that some users focus narrowly on speci c topics, while others participate across categories. This not only allows us to map related categories, but to characterize the entropy of the users interests. We nd that lower entropy correlates with receiving higher answer ratings, but only for categories where factual expertise is primarily sought after.
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.