Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
The Closest Substring Problem is to decide, for given strings s1, , sk of length at most and numbers m and d, whether there is a length-m string s and length-m substrings si of si, such that s has a Hamming distance of at most d from each si. If we instead require the sum of all the Hamming distances between s and each si to be bounded by d, then it is called the Consensus Patterns Problem. We contribute to the parameterised complexity analysis of these classical NP-hard string problems by investigating the parameter ( m), i.e., the length difference between input and solution strings. For most combinations of ( m) and one of the classical parameters (m, , k, or d), we obtain fixed-parameter tractability. However, even for constant ( m) and constant alphabet size, both problems remain NP-hard. While this follows from known results with respect to the Closest Substring, we need a new reduction in the case of the Consensus Patterns. As a by-product of this reduction, we obtain an exact exponential-time algorithm for both problems, which is based on an alphabet reduction.
ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT) – Association for Computing Machinery
Published: Sep 18, 2017
Keywords: Parameterised complexity
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.