Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1999)
AcceleratedSAP: Driving Rapid Implementations for Rapid Results
A. Scheer (1998)
ARIS - Business Process Frameworks
(1999)
Scheer, Ed
T. Malone, Kevin Crowston, Jintae Lee, B. Pentland (1999)
Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational ProcessesManagement Science, 45
K. Lyytinen, R. Hirschheim (1988)
Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature
(1997)
Next Generation Enterprise Applications, 9/1997, and Systems Software Architecture Scenarios
uni-sb.de) is the director of the Institute for Information Systems at the University of Saarland
August-Wilhelm Scheer and Frank Habermann MAKING ERP A SU CCESS Using business process models to achieve positive results. B usiness information systems can be either designed as custom applications or purchased as off-the-shelf standard solutions. The development of custom applications is generally expensive and is often plagued by uncertainties, such as the selection of appropriate development tools, the duration of the development cycle, or the difficulties involved in assessing costs. Thus, empirical surveys have shown that between half to two-thirds of information systems projects fail [3]. The current tendency to shift from individual development to standardized, prepackaged software solutions is therefore not surprising. Yet, standardized ERP systems such as SAP R/3, Oracle Applications, and PeopleSoft have disadvantages, too. Huge storage needs, networking requirements, and training overheads are frequently mentioned ERP problems. However, the scale of Business Process Reengineering (BPR) and customization tasks involved in the software implementation process are the major reasons for ERP dissatisfaction [1]. Baan, Peoplesoft, as well as SAP calculate that customers spend between three and seven times more money on ERP implementation and associated services compared to the purchase of the software license. Our own experiences validate that the ratio between ERP implementation efforts
Communications of the ACM – Association for Computing Machinery
Published: Apr 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.