Universal behavior of electron g-factors in semiconductor nanostructures

Universal behavior of electron g-factors in semiconductor nanostructures We combine analytic developments and numerical tight-binding calculations to study the evolution of the electron g-factors in homogeneous nanostructures of III-V and II-VI semiconductors. We demonstrate that the g-factor can be always written as a sum of bulk and surface terms. The bulk term, the dominant one, just depends on the energy gap of the nanostructure but is otherwise isotropic and independent of size, shape, and dimensionality. At the same time, the magnetic moment density at the origin of the bulk term is anisotropic and strongly dependents on the nanostructure shape. The physical origin of these seemingly contradictory findings is explained by the relation between the spin-orbit-induced currents and the spatial derivatives of the electron envelope wave function. The tight-binding calculations show that the g-factor versus energy gap for spherical nanocrystals can be used as a reference curve. In quantum wells, nanoplatelets, nanorods, and nanowires, the g-factor along the rotational symmetry axis can be predicted from the reference curve with a good accuracy. The g-factors along nonsymmetric axes exhibit more important deviations due to surface contributions but the energy gap remains the main quantity determining their evolution. The importance of surface-induced anisotropies of the g-factors is discussed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Physical Review B American Physical Society (APS)

Universal behavior of electron g-factors in semiconductor nanostructures

Preview Only

Universal behavior of electron g-factors in semiconductor nanostructures

Abstract

We combine analytic developments and numerical tight-binding calculations to study the evolution of the electron g-factors in homogeneous nanostructures of III-V and II-VI semiconductors. We demonstrate that the g-factor can be always written as a sum of bulk and surface terms. The bulk term, the dominant one, just depends on the energy gap of the nanostructure but is otherwise isotropic and independent of size, shape, and dimensionality. At the same time, the magnetic moment density at the origin of the bulk term is anisotropic and strongly dependents on the nanostructure shape. The physical origin of these seemingly contradictory findings is explained by the relation between the spin-orbit-induced currents and the spatial derivatives of the electron envelope wave function. The tight-binding calculations show that the g-factor versus energy gap for spherical nanocrystals can be used as a reference curve. In quantum wells, nanoplatelets, nanorods, and nanowires, the g-factor along the rotational symmetry axis can be predicted from the reference curve with a good accuracy. The g-factors along nonsymmetric axes exhibit more important deviations due to surface contributions but the energy gap remains the main quantity determining their evolution. The importance of surface-induced anisotropies of the g-factors is discussed.
Loading next page...
 
/lp/aps_physical/universal-behavior-of-electron-g-factors-in-semiconductor-IMHsidwrV1
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Copyright
Copyright © ©2017 American Physical Society
ISSN
1098-0121
eISSN
1550-235X
D.O.I.
10.1103/PhysRevB.95.235437
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We combine analytic developments and numerical tight-binding calculations to study the evolution of the electron g-factors in homogeneous nanostructures of III-V and II-VI semiconductors. We demonstrate that the g-factor can be always written as a sum of bulk and surface terms. The bulk term, the dominant one, just depends on the energy gap of the nanostructure but is otherwise isotropic and independent of size, shape, and dimensionality. At the same time, the magnetic moment density at the origin of the bulk term is anisotropic and strongly dependents on the nanostructure shape. The physical origin of these seemingly contradictory findings is explained by the relation between the spin-orbit-induced currents and the spatial derivatives of the electron envelope wave function. The tight-binding calculations show that the g-factor versus energy gap for spherical nanocrystals can be used as a reference curve. In quantum wells, nanoplatelets, nanorods, and nanowires, the g-factor along the rotational symmetry axis can be predicted from the reference curve with a good accuracy. The g-factors along nonsymmetric axes exhibit more important deviations due to surface contributions but the energy gap remains the main quantity determining their evolution. The importance of surface-induced anisotropies of the g-factors is discussed.

Journal

Physical Review BAmerican Physical Society (APS)

Published: Jun 30, 2017

There are no references for this article.

Sorry, we don’t have permission to share this article on DeepDyve,
but here are related articles that you can start reading right now:

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off