Reply to “Comment on ‘Thermal-light-induced dynamics: Coherence and revivals in V-type and molecular Jaynes-Cummings systems’ ”

Reply to “Comment on ‘Thermal-light-induced dynamics: Coherence and revivals in V-type and... We recently presented an extended Jaynes-Cummings model for the interaction of a realistic molecular system of two Born-Oppenheimer potential energy surfaces and a quantized electromagnetic field [Avisar and Wilson-Gordon, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033843 (2016)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.93.033843]. We studied the interaction of this molecular model, and also a prototype V-type system, with single-mode and multimode thermal states of the field, characterized by low and high average photon number n¯. Among our results, we showed that the three-mode thermal state of the field induces excited-state material coherence and that a thermal state of high n¯ can induce “coherentlike” collapse and revival patterns. The preceding Comment by Dodin and Brumer [Phys. Rev. A 95, 067801 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevA.95.067801] criticizes our work for allegedly drawing conclusions regarding sunlight-induced dynamics from our results, and for unjustified citation of previous work. However, we think the Comment fails to represent the contents of our paper, and we therefore reply to it. We show it is based on misinterpretation of our paper. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Physical Review A American Physical Society (APS)

Reply to “Comment on ‘Thermal-light-induced dynamics: Coherence and revivals in V-type and molecular Jaynes-Cummings systems’ ”

Preview Only

Reply to “Comment on ‘Thermal-light-induced dynamics: Coherence and revivals in V-type and molecular Jaynes-Cummings systems’ ”

Abstract

We recently presented an extended Jaynes-Cummings model for the interaction of a realistic molecular system of two Born-Oppenheimer potential energy surfaces and a quantized electromagnetic field [Avisar and Wilson-Gordon, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033843 (2016)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.93.033843]. We studied the interaction of this molecular model, and also a prototype V-type system, with single-mode and multimode thermal states of the field, characterized by low and high average photon number n¯. Among our results, we showed that the three-mode thermal state of the field induces excited-state material coherence and that a thermal state of high n¯ can induce “coherentlike” collapse and revival patterns. The preceding Comment by Dodin and Brumer [Phys. Rev. A 95, 067801 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevA.95.067801] criticizes our work for allegedly drawing conclusions regarding sunlight-induced dynamics from our results, and for unjustified citation of previous work. However, we think the Comment fails to represent the contents of our paper, and we therefore reply to it. We show it is based on misinterpretation of our paper.
Loading next page...
 
/lp/aps_physical/reply-to-comment-on-thermal-light-induced-dynamics-coherence-and-SE0tKUBXGM
Publisher
The American Physical Society
Copyright
Copyright © ©2017 American Physical Society
ISSN
1050-2947
eISSN
1094-1622
D.O.I.
10.1103/PhysRevA.95.067802
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We recently presented an extended Jaynes-Cummings model for the interaction of a realistic molecular system of two Born-Oppenheimer potential energy surfaces and a quantized electromagnetic field [Avisar and Wilson-Gordon, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033843 (2016)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.93.033843]. We studied the interaction of this molecular model, and also a prototype V-type system, with single-mode and multimode thermal states of the field, characterized by low and high average photon number n¯. Among our results, we showed that the three-mode thermal state of the field induces excited-state material coherence and that a thermal state of high n¯ can induce “coherentlike” collapse and revival patterns. The preceding Comment by Dodin and Brumer [Phys. Rev. A 95, 067801 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevA.95.067801] criticizes our work for allegedly drawing conclusions regarding sunlight-induced dynamics from our results, and for unjustified citation of previous work. However, we think the Comment fails to represent the contents of our paper, and we therefore reply to it. We show it is based on misinterpretation of our paper.

Journal

Physical Review AAmerican Physical Society (APS)

Published: Jun 28, 2017

There are no references for this article.

Sorry, we don’t have permission to share this article on DeepDyve,
but here are related articles that you can start reading right now:

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off