Erratum: Quantum-continuum calculation of the surface states and electrical response of silicon in solution [Phys. Rev. B 95, 205308 (2017)]

Erratum: Quantum-continuum calculation of the surface states and electrical response of silicon... PHYSICAL REVIEW B 96, 039901(E) (2017) Erratum: Quantum-continuum calculation of the surface states and electrical response of silicon in solution [Phys. Rev. B 95, 205308 (2017)] Quinn Campbell and Ismaila Dabo (Received 26 June 2017; published 6 July 2017) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.039901 We correct an error in Sec. II C of our original paper, appearing in Eqs. (21) and (22) which leads to errors in the reported results in Sec. IV. All of the trends shown remain the same, and the conclusions drawn from the paper remain valid. Equations (21) and (22) should read dϕ ¯ ϕ ¯ = ϕ ¯ (z ) − k T − (z ) (21) 0 c B c 2N dz and dϕ ¯ ϕ ¯ = ϕ ¯ (z ) + k T + (z ) . (22) 0 c B c 2P dz This removes an unphysical interaction between different dielectric constants at the boundary of Regions I and II and brings the physical picture more in line with the one shown in Fig. 3 of the original paper. Figure 1 here illustrates this difference. TABLE I. Fitted surface-state properties for the ten surface configurations tested. The percentage of the total potential drop http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Physical Review B American Physical Society (APS)

Erratum: Quantum-continuum calculation of the surface states and electrical response of silicon in solution [Phys. Rev. B 95, 205308 (2017)]

Preview Only

Erratum: Quantum-continuum calculation of the surface states and electrical response of silicon in solution [Phys. Rev. B 95, 205308 (2017)]

Abstract

PHYSICAL REVIEW B 96, 039901(E) (2017) Erratum: Quantum-continuum calculation of the surface states and electrical response of silicon in solution [Phys. Rev. B 95, 205308 (2017)] Quinn Campbell and Ismaila Dabo (Received 26 June 2017; published 6 July 2017) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.039901 We correct an error in Sec. II C of our original paper, appearing in Eqs. (21) and (22) which leads to errors in the reported results in Sec. IV. All of the trends shown remain the same, and the conclusions drawn from the paper remain valid. Equations (21) and (22) should read dϕ ¯ ϕ ¯ = ϕ ¯ (z ) − k T − (z ) (21) 0 c B c 2N dz and dϕ ¯ ϕ ¯ = ϕ ¯ (z ) + k T + (z ) . (22) 0 c B c 2P dz This removes an unphysical interaction between different dielectric constants at the boundary of Regions I and II and brings the physical picture more in line with the one shown in Fig. 3 of the original paper. Figure 1 here illustrates this difference. TABLE I. Fitted surface-state properties for the ten surface configurations tested. The percentage of the total potential drop
Loading next page...
 
/lp/aps_physical/erratum-quantum-continuum-calculation-of-the-surface-states-and-VlYXsPijFl
Publisher
The American Physical Society
Copyright
Copyright © ©2017 American Physical Society
ISSN
1098-0121
eISSN
1550-235X
D.O.I.
10.1103/PhysRevB.96.039901
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PHYSICAL REVIEW B 96, 039901(E) (2017) Erratum: Quantum-continuum calculation of the surface states and electrical response of silicon in solution [Phys. Rev. B 95, 205308 (2017)] Quinn Campbell and Ismaila Dabo (Received 26 June 2017; published 6 July 2017) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.039901 We correct an error in Sec. II C of our original paper, appearing in Eqs. (21) and (22) which leads to errors in the reported results in Sec. IV. All of the trends shown remain the same, and the conclusions drawn from the paper remain valid. Equations (21) and (22) should read dϕ ¯ ϕ ¯ = ϕ ¯ (z ) − k T − (z ) (21) 0 c B c 2N dz and dϕ ¯ ϕ ¯ = ϕ ¯ (z ) + k T + (z ) . (22) 0 c B c 2P dz This removes an unphysical interaction between different dielectric constants at the boundary of Regions I and II and brings the physical picture more in line with the one shown in Fig. 3 of the original paper. Figure 1 here illustrates this difference. TABLE I. Fitted surface-state properties for the ten surface configurations tested. The percentage of the total potential drop

Journal

Physical Review BAmerican Physical Society (APS)

Published: Jul 6, 2017

There are no references for this article.

Sorry, we don’t have permission to share this article on DeepDyve,
but here are related articles that you can start reading right now:

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off