Erratum: Quantum-continuum calculation of the surface states and electrical response of silicon in solution [Phys. Rev. B 95, 205308 (2017)]

Erratum: Quantum-continuum calculation of the surface states and electrical response of silicon... PHYSICAL REVIEW B 96, 039901(E) (2017) Erratum: Quantum-continuum calculation of the surface states and electrical response of silicon in solution [Phys. Rev. B 95, 205308 (2017)] Quinn Campbell and Ismaila Dabo (Received 26 June 2017; published 6 July 2017) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.039901 We correct an error in Sec. II C of our original paper, appearing in Eqs. (21) and (22) which leads to errors in the reported results in Sec. IV. All of the trends shown remain the same, and the conclusions drawn from the paper remain valid. Equations (21) and (22) should read dϕ ¯ ϕ ¯ = ϕ ¯ (z ) − k T − (z ) (21) 0 c B c 2N dz and dϕ ¯ ϕ ¯ = ϕ ¯ (z ) + k T + (z ) . (22) 0 c B c 2P dz This removes an unphysical interaction between different dielectric constants at the boundary of Regions I and II and brings the physical picture more in line with the one shown in Fig. 3 of the original paper. Figure 1 here illustrates this difference. TABLE I. Fitted surface-state properties for the ten surface configurations tested. The percentage of the total potential drop http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Physical Review B American Physical Society (APS)

Erratum: Quantum-continuum calculation of the surface states and electrical response of silicon in solution [Phys. Rev. B 95, 205308 (2017)]

Preview Only

Erratum: Quantum-continuum calculation of the surface states and electrical response of silicon in solution [Phys. Rev. B 95, 205308 (2017)]

Abstract

PHYSICAL REVIEW B 96, 039901(E) (2017) Erratum: Quantum-continuum calculation of the surface states and electrical response of silicon in solution [Phys. Rev. B 95, 205308 (2017)] Quinn Campbell and Ismaila Dabo (Received 26 June 2017; published 6 July 2017) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.039901 We correct an error in Sec. II C of our original paper, appearing in Eqs. (21) and (22) which leads to errors in the reported results in Sec. IV. All of the trends shown remain the same, and the conclusions drawn from the paper remain valid. Equations (21) and (22) should read dϕ ¯ ϕ ¯ = ϕ ¯ (z ) − k T − (z ) (21) 0 c B c 2N dz and dϕ ¯ ϕ ¯ = ϕ ¯ (z ) + k T + (z ) . (22) 0 c B c 2P dz This removes an unphysical interaction between different dielectric constants at the boundary of Regions I and II and brings the physical picture more in line with the one shown in Fig. 3 of the original paper. Figure 1 here illustrates this difference. TABLE I. Fitted surface-state properties for the ten surface configurations tested. The percentage of the total potential drop
Loading next page...
 
/lp/aps_physical/erratum-quantum-continuum-calculation-of-the-surface-states-and-VlYXsPijFl
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Copyright
Copyright © ©2017 American Physical Society
ISSN
1098-0121
eISSN
1550-235X
D.O.I.
10.1103/PhysRevB.96.039901
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PHYSICAL REVIEW B 96, 039901(E) (2017) Erratum: Quantum-continuum calculation of the surface states and electrical response of silicon in solution [Phys. Rev. B 95, 205308 (2017)] Quinn Campbell and Ismaila Dabo (Received 26 June 2017; published 6 July 2017) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.039901 We correct an error in Sec. II C of our original paper, appearing in Eqs. (21) and (22) which leads to errors in the reported results in Sec. IV. All of the trends shown remain the same, and the conclusions drawn from the paper remain valid. Equations (21) and (22) should read dϕ ¯ ϕ ¯ = ϕ ¯ (z ) − k T − (z ) (21) 0 c B c 2N dz and dϕ ¯ ϕ ¯ = ϕ ¯ (z ) + k T + (z ) . (22) 0 c B c 2P dz This removes an unphysical interaction between different dielectric constants at the boundary of Regions I and II and brings the physical picture more in line with the one shown in Fig. 3 of the original paper. Figure 1 here illustrates this difference. TABLE I. Fitted surface-state properties for the ten surface configurations tested. The percentage of the total potential drop

Journal

Physical Review BAmerican Physical Society (APS)

Published: Jul 6, 2017

There are no references for this article.

Sorry, we don’t have permission to share this article on DeepDyve,
but here are related articles that you can start reading right now:

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off