Erratum: Polarization observables for millicharged particles in photon collisions [Phys. Rev. D 94, 095014 (2016)]

Erratum: Polarization observables for millicharged particles in photon collisions [Phys. Rev. D... PHYSICAL REVIEW D 95, 119903(E) (2017) Erratum: Polarization observables for millicharged particles in photon collisions [Phys. Rev. D 94, 095014 (2016)] Emidio Gabrielli, Luca Marzola, Edoardo Milotti, and Hardi Veermäe (Received 29 May 2017; published 26 June 2017) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.119903 Here we clarify, revise and expand the experimental scheme that we proposed in original paper. In the original scheme, the dark fringe is defined by the condition φ ¼ π so that the interference is normally destructive, i.e., pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi I ¼ I þ I − 2 I I ; ð1Þ tot 1 2 1 2 where the subscripts 1 and 2 denote the two parts of the split beam: 1 corresponds to the part that does not interact with the probe beam, 2 is the part that can be affected by the interaction with the probe beam. These two parts can be further individually modulated (both in amplitude and phase) before interfering on the detector plane. When the beams are static and exactly balanced we have I ¼ I ¼ I , so that I ¼ 0. To avoid confusion, here all of the variables that deal with the 1 2 0 tot probe beam have the subscript “probe” http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Physical Review D American Physical Society (APS)

Erratum: Polarization observables for millicharged particles in photon collisions [Phys. Rev. D 94, 095014 (2016)]

Preview Only

Erratum: Polarization observables for millicharged particles in photon collisions [Phys. Rev. D 94, 095014 (2016)]

Abstract

PHYSICAL REVIEW D 95, 119903(E) (2017) Erratum: Polarization observables for millicharged particles in photon collisions [Phys. Rev. D 94, 095014 (2016)] Emidio Gabrielli, Luca Marzola, Edoardo Milotti, and Hardi Veermäe (Received 29 May 2017; published 26 June 2017) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.119903 Here we clarify, revise and expand the experimental scheme that we proposed in original paper. In the original scheme, the dark fringe is defined by the condition φ ¼ π so that the interference is normally destructive, i.e., pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi I ¼ I þ I − 2 I I ; ð1Þ tot 1 2 1 2 where the subscripts 1 and 2 denote the two parts of the split beam: 1 corresponds to the part that does not interact with the probe beam, 2 is the part that can be affected by the interaction with the probe beam. These two parts can be further individually modulated (both in amplitude and phase) before interfering on the detector plane. When the beams are static and exactly balanced we have I ¼ I ¼ I , so that I ¼ 0. To avoid confusion, here all of the variables that deal with the 1 2 0 tot probe beam have the subscript “probe”
Loading next page...
 
/lp/aps_physical/erratum-polarization-observables-for-millicharged-particles-in-photon-PGPx00nFyi
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Copyright
Copyright © © 2017 American Physical Society
ISSN
1550-7998
eISSN
1550-2368
D.O.I.
10.1103/PhysRevD.95.119903
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PHYSICAL REVIEW D 95, 119903(E) (2017) Erratum: Polarization observables for millicharged particles in photon collisions [Phys. Rev. D 94, 095014 (2016)] Emidio Gabrielli, Luca Marzola, Edoardo Milotti, and Hardi Veermäe (Received 29 May 2017; published 26 June 2017) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.119903 Here we clarify, revise and expand the experimental scheme that we proposed in original paper. In the original scheme, the dark fringe is defined by the condition φ ¼ π so that the interference is normally destructive, i.e., pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi I ¼ I þ I − 2 I I ; ð1Þ tot 1 2 1 2 where the subscripts 1 and 2 denote the two parts of the split beam: 1 corresponds to the part that does not interact with the probe beam, 2 is the part that can be affected by the interaction with the probe beam. These two parts can be further individually modulated (both in amplitude and phase) before interfering on the detector plane. When the beams are static and exactly balanced we have I ¼ I ¼ I , so that I ¼ 0. To avoid confusion, here all of the variables that deal with the 1 2 0 tot probe beam have the subscript “probe”

Journal

Physical Review DAmerican Physical Society (APS)

Published: Jun 1, 2017

There are no references for this article.

Sorry, we don’t have permission to share this article on DeepDyve,
but here are related articles that you can start reading right now:

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off