Erratum: Polarization observables for millicharged particles in photon collisions [Phys. Rev. D 94, 095014 (2016)]

Erratum: Polarization observables for millicharged particles in photon collisions [Phys. Rev. D... PHYSICAL REVIEW D 95, 119903(E) (2017) Erratum: Polarization observables for millicharged particles in photon collisions [Phys. Rev. D 94, 095014 (2016)] Emidio Gabrielli, Luca Marzola, Edoardo Milotti, and Hardi Veermäe (Received 29 May 2017; published 26 June 2017) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.119903 Here we clarify, revise and expand the experimental scheme that we proposed in original paper. In the original scheme, the dark fringe is defined by the condition φ ¼ π so that the interference is normally destructive, i.e., pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi I ¼ I þ I − 2 I I ; ð1Þ tot 1 2 1 2 where the subscripts 1 and 2 denote the two parts of the split beam: 1 corresponds to the part that does not interact with the probe beam, 2 is the part that can be affected by the interaction with the probe beam. These two parts can be further individually modulated (both in amplitude and phase) before interfering on the detector plane. When the beams are static and exactly balanced we have I ¼ I ¼ I , so that I ¼ 0. To avoid confusion, here all of the variables that deal with the 1 2 0 tot probe beam have the subscript “probe” http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Physical Review D American Physical Society (APS)

Erratum: Polarization observables for millicharged particles in photon collisions [Phys. Rev. D 94, 095014 (2016)]

Preview Only

Erratum: Polarization observables for millicharged particles in photon collisions [Phys. Rev. D 94, 095014 (2016)]

Abstract

PHYSICAL REVIEW D 95, 119903(E) (2017) Erratum: Polarization observables for millicharged particles in photon collisions [Phys. Rev. D 94, 095014 (2016)] Emidio Gabrielli, Luca Marzola, Edoardo Milotti, and Hardi Veermäe (Received 29 May 2017; published 26 June 2017) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.119903 Here we clarify, revise and expand the experimental scheme that we proposed in original paper. In the original scheme, the dark fringe is defined by the condition φ ¼ π so that the interference is normally destructive, i.e., pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi I ¼ I þ I − 2 I I ; ð1Þ tot 1 2 1 2 where the subscripts 1 and 2 denote the two parts of the split beam: 1 corresponds to the part that does not interact with the probe beam, 2 is the part that can be affected by the interaction with the probe beam. These two parts can be further individually modulated (both in amplitude and phase) before interfering on the detector plane. When the beams are static and exactly balanced we have I ¼ I ¼ I , so that I ¼ 0. To avoid confusion, here all of the variables that deal with the 1 2 0 tot probe beam have the subscript “probe”
Loading next page...
 
/lp/aps_physical/erratum-polarization-observables-for-millicharged-particles-in-photon-PGPx00nFyi
Publisher
The American Physical Society
Copyright
Copyright © © 2017 American Physical Society
ISSN
1550-7998
eISSN
1550-2368
D.O.I.
10.1103/PhysRevD.95.119903
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PHYSICAL REVIEW D 95, 119903(E) (2017) Erratum: Polarization observables for millicharged particles in photon collisions [Phys. Rev. D 94, 095014 (2016)] Emidio Gabrielli, Luca Marzola, Edoardo Milotti, and Hardi Veermäe (Received 29 May 2017; published 26 June 2017) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.119903 Here we clarify, revise and expand the experimental scheme that we proposed in original paper. In the original scheme, the dark fringe is defined by the condition φ ¼ π so that the interference is normally destructive, i.e., pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi I ¼ I þ I − 2 I I ; ð1Þ tot 1 2 1 2 where the subscripts 1 and 2 denote the two parts of the split beam: 1 corresponds to the part that does not interact with the probe beam, 2 is the part that can be affected by the interaction with the probe beam. These two parts can be further individually modulated (both in amplitude and phase) before interfering on the detector plane. When the beams are static and exactly balanced we have I ¼ I ¼ I , so that I ¼ 0. To avoid confusion, here all of the variables that deal with the 1 2 0 tot probe beam have the subscript “probe”

Journal

Physical Review DAmerican Physical Society (APS)

Published: Jun 1, 2017

There are no references for this article.

Sorry, we don’t have permission to share this article on DeepDyve,
but here are related articles that you can start reading right now:

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial