Comment on “Electron-phonon coupling in two-dimensional silicene and germanene”

Comment on “Electron-phonon coupling in two-dimensional silicene and germanene” In their work, Yan et al. [Phys. Rev. B 88, 121403 (2013)PRBMDO1098-012110.1103/PhysRevB.88.121403] employing density functional perturbation theory (DFPT) calculations, demonstrate that silicene and germanene show weaker Kohn anomalies in the Γ-Eg and K-A1 phonon modes, compared to graphene. Furthermore, the electron-phonon (e-ph) coupling matrix elements were computed using the frozen-phonon approach. They found that in silicene the average e-ph coupling matrix element square over the Fermi-surface ⟨gqν2⟩F is about 50% of those in graphene, but in germanene is weaker and nearly negligible. However, Yan et al. [Phys. Rev. B 88, 121403 (2013)PRBMDO1098-012110.1103/PhysRevB.88.121403] argue that the smaller Fermi velocity in silicene compensates the reduced ⟨gqν2⟩F, leading to phonon linewidths (γqν) slightly larger than those in graphene. In this Comment, we show that the DFPT and the frozen-phonon results of Yan et al. [Phys. Rev. B 88, 121403 (2013)PRBMDO1098-012110.1103/PhysRevB.88.121403] for silicene are inconsistent. Additionally, we have evaluated the e-ph coupling using direct DFPT calculations, analytical relations, and frozen-phonon calculations, and we found systematically that ⟨gqν2⟩F and γqν in silicene are one order of magnitude smaller than in graphene, in contrast to the conclusions of Yan et al. [Phys. Rev. B 88, 121403 (2013)PRBMDO1098-012110.1103/PhysRevB.88.121403]. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Physical Review B American Physical Society (APS)

Comment on “Electron-phonon coupling in two-dimensional silicene and germanene”

Preview Only

Comment on “Electron-phonon coupling in two-dimensional silicene and germanene”

Abstract

In their work, Yan et al. [Phys. Rev. B 88, 121403 (2013)PRBMDO1098-012110.1103/PhysRevB.88.121403] employing density functional perturbation theory (DFPT) calculations, demonstrate that silicene and germanene show weaker Kohn anomalies in the Γ-Eg and K-A1 phonon modes, compared to graphene. Furthermore, the electron-phonon (e-ph) coupling matrix elements were computed using the frozen-phonon approach. They found that in silicene the average e-ph coupling matrix element square over the Fermi-surface ⟨gqν2⟩F is about 50% of those in graphene, but in germanene is weaker and nearly negligible. However, Yan et al. [Phys. Rev. B 88, 121403 (2013)PRBMDO1098-012110.1103/PhysRevB.88.121403] argue that the smaller Fermi velocity in silicene compensates the reduced ⟨gqν2⟩F, leading to phonon linewidths (γqν) slightly larger than those in graphene. In this Comment, we show that the DFPT and the frozen-phonon results of Yan et al. [Phys. Rev. B 88, 121403 (2013)PRBMDO1098-012110.1103/PhysRevB.88.121403] for silicene are inconsistent. Additionally, we have evaluated the e-ph coupling using direct DFPT calculations, analytical relations, and frozen-phonon calculations, and we found systematically that ⟨gqν2⟩F and γqν in silicene are one order of magnitude smaller than in graphene, in contrast to the conclusions of Yan et al. [Phys. Rev. B 88, 121403 (2013)PRBMDO1098-012110.1103/PhysRevB.88.121403].
Loading next page...
 
/lp/aps_physical/comment-on-electron-phonon-coupling-in-two-dimensional-silicene-and-wH3wg4NG0g
Publisher
The American Physical Society
Copyright
Copyright © ©2017 American Physical Society
ISSN
1098-0121
eISSN
1550-235X
D.O.I.
10.1103/PhysRevB.96.047401
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In their work, Yan et al. [Phys. Rev. B 88, 121403 (2013)PRBMDO1098-012110.1103/PhysRevB.88.121403] employing density functional perturbation theory (DFPT) calculations, demonstrate that silicene and germanene show weaker Kohn anomalies in the Γ-Eg and K-A1 phonon modes, compared to graphene. Furthermore, the electron-phonon (e-ph) coupling matrix elements were computed using the frozen-phonon approach. They found that in silicene the average e-ph coupling matrix element square over the Fermi-surface ⟨gqν2⟩F is about 50% of those in graphene, but in germanene is weaker and nearly negligible. However, Yan et al. [Phys. Rev. B 88, 121403 (2013)PRBMDO1098-012110.1103/PhysRevB.88.121403] argue that the smaller Fermi velocity in silicene compensates the reduced ⟨gqν2⟩F, leading to phonon linewidths (γqν) slightly larger than those in graphene. In this Comment, we show that the DFPT and the frozen-phonon results of Yan et al. [Phys. Rev. B 88, 121403 (2013)PRBMDO1098-012110.1103/PhysRevB.88.121403] for silicene are inconsistent. Additionally, we have evaluated the e-ph coupling using direct DFPT calculations, analytical relations, and frozen-phonon calculations, and we found systematically that ⟨gqν2⟩F and γqν in silicene are one order of magnitude smaller than in graphene, in contrast to the conclusions of Yan et al. [Phys. Rev. B 88, 121403 (2013)PRBMDO1098-012110.1103/PhysRevB.88.121403].

Journal

Physical Review BAmerican Physical Society (APS)

Published: Jul 25, 2017

There are no references for this article.

Sorry, we don’t have permission to share this article on DeepDyve,
but here are related articles that you can start reading right now:

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial