Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Small-Scale Challenges to the CDM Paradigm

Small-Scale Challenges to the CDM Paradigm The dark energy plus cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model has been a demonstrably successful framework for predicting and explaining the large-scale structure of the Universe and its evolution with time. Yet on length scales smaller than 1 Mpc and mass scales smaller than 1011M, the theory faces a number of challenges. For example, the observed cores of many dark matterdominated galaxies are both less dense and less cuspy than navely predicted in CDM. The number of small galaxies and dwarf satellites in the Local Group is also far below the predicted count of low-mass dark matter halos and subhalos within similar volumes. These issues underlie the most well-documented problems with CDM: cusp/core, missing satellites, and too-big-to-fail. The key question is whether a better understanding of baryon physics, dark matter physics, or both is required to meet these challenges. Other anomalies, including the observed planar and orbital configurations of Local Group satellites and the tight baryonic/dark matter scaling relations obeyed by the galaxy population, have been less thoroughly explored in the context of CDM theory. Future surveys to discover faint, distant dwarf galaxies and to precisely measure their masses and density structure hold promising avenues for testing possible solutions to the small-scale challenges going forward. Observational programs to constrain or discover and characterize the number of truly dark low-mass halos are among the most important, and achievable, goals in this field over the next decade. These efforts will either further verify the CDM paradigm or demand a substantial revision in our understanding of the nature of dark matter. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics Annual Reviews

Small-Scale Challenges to the CDM Paradigm

Download PDF
45 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/annual_reviews/small-scale-challenges-to-the-cdm-paradigm-00D1ERmyid

References (238)

Publisher
Annual Reviews
Copyright
Copyright 2017 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved
ISSN
0066-4146
eISSN
1545-4282
DOI
10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The dark energy plus cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model has been a demonstrably successful framework for predicting and explaining the large-scale structure of the Universe and its evolution with time. Yet on length scales smaller than 1 Mpc and mass scales smaller than 1011M, the theory faces a number of challenges. For example, the observed cores of many dark matterdominated galaxies are both less dense and less cuspy than navely predicted in CDM. The number of small galaxies and dwarf satellites in the Local Group is also far below the predicted count of low-mass dark matter halos and subhalos within similar volumes. These issues underlie the most well-documented problems with CDM: cusp/core, missing satellites, and too-big-to-fail. The key question is whether a better understanding of baryon physics, dark matter physics, or both is required to meet these challenges. Other anomalies, including the observed planar and orbital configurations of Local Group satellites and the tight baryonic/dark matter scaling relations obeyed by the galaxy population, have been less thoroughly explored in the context of CDM theory. Future surveys to discover faint, distant dwarf galaxies and to precisely measure their masses and density structure hold promising avenues for testing possible solutions to the small-scale challenges going forward. Observational programs to constrain or discover and characterize the number of truly dark low-mass halos are among the most important, and achievable, goals in this field over the next decade. These efforts will either further verify the CDM paradigm or demand a substantial revision in our understanding of the nature of dark matter.

Journal

Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics – Annual Reviews

Published: Aug 18, 2017

There are no references for this article.