Verification of Multi-Model Ensemble Forecasts of North Atlantic Tropical Cyclones.

Verification of Multi-Model Ensemble Forecasts of North Atlantic Tropical Cyclones. AbstractNorth Atlantic tropical cyclone (TC) forecasts from four ensemble prediction systems (EPS) are verified using the National Hurricane Center’s (NHC) best tracks for the 2008 through 2015 seasons. The one to five day forecasts are evaluated for the 21-member National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS), the 23-member UKMET ensemble, and the 51-member European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) ensemble, as well as a combination of these ensembles (Multi-Model Global; MMG). Several deterministic models are also evaluated, such as the Global Forecast System (GFSdet), Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF), deterministic ECMWF (ECdet), and Geophysical Fluids Dynamical Laboratory (GFDL) models. ECdet track errors are the smallest on average at all lead times, but are not significantly different from the GEFS and ECMWF ensemble means. All models have a slow bias (90 to 240 km) in the along-track direction by 120 h, while there is little bias in the cross-track direction. Much of this slow bias is attributed to TCs undergoing extratropical transition (ET). All EPSs are underdispersed in the along-track direction, while the ECMWF is slightly overdispersed in the cross-track direction. The MMG and ECMWF track forecasts have more probabilistic skill than the ECdet and comparable skill to the NHC climatology-based cone forecast. TC intensity errors for the HWRF and GFDL are lower than the coarser models within the first 24 h, but are comparable to the ECdet at longer lead times. The ECMWF and MMG have comparable or better probabilistic intensity forecasts than the ECdet, while the GEFS’s weak bias limits its skill. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Weather and Forecasting American Meteorological Society

Verification of Multi-Model Ensemble Forecasts of North Atlantic Tropical Cyclones.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/verification-of-multi-model-ensemble-forecasts-of-north-atlantic-o92Na5LNKS
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0434
D.O.I.
10.1175/WAF-D-17-0058.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractNorth Atlantic tropical cyclone (TC) forecasts from four ensemble prediction systems (EPS) are verified using the National Hurricane Center’s (NHC) best tracks for the 2008 through 2015 seasons. The one to five day forecasts are evaluated for the 21-member National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS), the 23-member UKMET ensemble, and the 51-member European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) ensemble, as well as a combination of these ensembles (Multi-Model Global; MMG). Several deterministic models are also evaluated, such as the Global Forecast System (GFSdet), Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF), deterministic ECMWF (ECdet), and Geophysical Fluids Dynamical Laboratory (GFDL) models. ECdet track errors are the smallest on average at all lead times, but are not significantly different from the GEFS and ECMWF ensemble means. All models have a slow bias (90 to 240 km) in the along-track direction by 120 h, while there is little bias in the cross-track direction. Much of this slow bias is attributed to TCs undergoing extratropical transition (ET). All EPSs are underdispersed in the along-track direction, while the ECMWF is slightly overdispersed in the cross-track direction. The MMG and ECMWF track forecasts have more probabilistic skill than the ECdet and comparable skill to the NHC climatology-based cone forecast. TC intensity errors for the HWRF and GFDL are lower than the coarser models within the first 24 h, but are comparable to the ECdet at longer lead times. The ECMWF and MMG have comparable or better probabilistic intensity forecasts than the ECdet, while the GEFS’s weak bias limits its skill.

Journal

Weather and ForecastingAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Sep 29, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off