Understanding Biases in Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecast Error

Understanding Biases in Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecast Error AbstractThe characteristics of 24-h official forecast errors (OFEs) of tropical cyclone (TC) intensity are analyzed over the North Atlantic, east Pacific, and western North Pacific. The OFE is demonstrated to be strongly anticorrelated with TC intensity change with correlation coefficients of −0.77, −0.77, and −0.68 for the three basins, respectively. The 24-h intensity change in the official forecast closely follows a Gaussian distribution with a standard deviation only ⅔ of that in nature, suggesting the current official forecasts estimate fewer cases of large intensity change. The intensifying systems tend to produce negative errors (underforecast), while weakening systems have consistent positive errors (overforecast). This asymmetrical bias is larger for extreme intensity change, including rapid intensification (RI) and rapid weakening (RW). To understand this behavior, the errors are analyzed in a simple objective model, the trend-persistence model (TPM). The TPM exhibits the same error-intensity change correlation. In the TPM, the error can be understood as it is exactly inversely proportional to the finite difference form of the concavity or second derivative of the intensity–time curve. The occurrence of large negative (positive) errors indicates the intensity–time curve is concave upward (downward) in nature during the TC’s rapid intensification (weakening) process. Thus, the fundamental feature of the OFE distribution is related to the shape of the intensity–time curve, governed by TC dynamics. All forecast systems have difficulty forecasting an accelerating rate of change, or a large second derivative of the intensity–time curve. TPM may also be useful as a baseline in evaluating the skill of official forecasts. According to this baseline, official forecasts are more skillful in RW than in RI. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Weather and Forecasting American Meteorological Society

Understanding Biases in Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecast Error

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/understanding-biases-in-tropical-cyclone-intensity-forecast-error-E6fOzuR7lG
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0434
D.O.I.
10.1175/WAF-D-17-0106.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractThe characteristics of 24-h official forecast errors (OFEs) of tropical cyclone (TC) intensity are analyzed over the North Atlantic, east Pacific, and western North Pacific. The OFE is demonstrated to be strongly anticorrelated with TC intensity change with correlation coefficients of −0.77, −0.77, and −0.68 for the three basins, respectively. The 24-h intensity change in the official forecast closely follows a Gaussian distribution with a standard deviation only ⅔ of that in nature, suggesting the current official forecasts estimate fewer cases of large intensity change. The intensifying systems tend to produce negative errors (underforecast), while weakening systems have consistent positive errors (overforecast). This asymmetrical bias is larger for extreme intensity change, including rapid intensification (RI) and rapid weakening (RW). To understand this behavior, the errors are analyzed in a simple objective model, the trend-persistence model (TPM). The TPM exhibits the same error-intensity change correlation. In the TPM, the error can be understood as it is exactly inversely proportional to the finite difference form of the concavity or second derivative of the intensity–time curve. The occurrence of large negative (positive) errors indicates the intensity–time curve is concave upward (downward) in nature during the TC’s rapid intensification (weakening) process. Thus, the fundamental feature of the OFE distribution is related to the shape of the intensity–time curve, governed by TC dynamics. All forecast systems have difficulty forecasting an accelerating rate of change, or a large second derivative of the intensity–time curve. TPM may also be useful as a baseline in evaluating the skill of official forecasts. According to this baseline, official forecasts are more skillful in RW than in RI.

Journal

Weather and ForecastingAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Feb 24, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off