AbstractIn most countries, national meteorological services (NMSs) either generate or have access to seasonal climate forecasts. However, in a number of regions the uptake of these forecasts by local communities can be limited with the locals instead relying on traditional knowledge (TK) to make their climate forecasts. Both approaches to seasonal climate forecasting have benefits and the incorporation of traditional forecast methods into contemporary forecast systems can lead to forecasts that are locally relevant and better trusted by the users. This in turn could significantly improve the communication and application of climate information, especially to remote communities. A number of different methodologies have been proposed for combining these forecasts. Through considering the benefits and limitations of each approach, practical recommendations are provided on selecting a method, in the form of a decision framework, that takes into consideration both user and provider needs. The framework comprises of four main decision points: 1) consideration of the level of involvement of traditional knowledge experts or the community that is required; 2) existing levels of traditional knowledge of climate forecasting and its level of cultural sensitivity; 3) the availability of long-term data – both TK and contemporary forecast components; 4) the level of resourcing available. No one method is suitable for everyone and every situation, however, the decision framework helps to select the most appropriate method for a given situation.
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology – American Meteorological Society
Published: Jul 12, 2017
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera