Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Coopersmith, M. Yaeger, S. Ye, Lei Cheng, M. Sivapalan (2012)
Exploring the physical controls of regional patterns of flow duration curves - Part 3: A catchment classification system based on regime curve indicatorsHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16
D. Entekhabi, E. Njoku, P. O’neill, K. Kellogg, W. Crow, W. Edelstein, J. Entin, S. Goodman, T. Jackson, J. Johnson, J. Kimball, J. Piepmeier, R. Koster, N. Martin, K. McDonald, M. Moghaddam, M. Moran, R. Reichle, Jiancheng Shi, M. Spencer, S. Thurman, L. Tsang, J. Zyl (2010)
The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) MissionProceedings of the IEEE, 98
S. Stillman, Jason Ninneman, X. Zeng, T. Franz, R. Scott, W. Shuttleworth, K. Cummins (2014)
Summer Soil Moisture Spatiotemporal Variability in Southeastern ArizonaJournal of Hydrometeorology, 15
Qing Liu, R. Reichle, R. Bindlish, M. Cosh, W. Crow, R. Jeu, G. Lannoy, G. Huffman, T. Jackson (2011)
The Contributions of Precipitation and Soil Moisture Observations to the Skill of Soil Moisture Estimates in a Land Data Assimilation SystemJournal of Hydrometeorology, 12
Champa Joshi, B. Mohanty (2010)
Physical controls of near‐surface soil moisture across varying spatial scales in an agricultural landscape during SMEX02Water Resources Research, 46
T. Jackson, R. Bindlish, M. Cosh, T. Zhao, P. Starks, D. Bosch, M. Seyfried, M. Moran, D. Goodrich, Y. Kerr, D. Leroux (2012)
Validation of Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) Soil Moisture Over Watershed Networks in the U.S.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50
A. Loew, T. Stacke, W. Dorigo, R. Jeu, S. Hagemann (2013)
Potential and limitations of multidecadal satellite soil moisture observations for selected climate model evaluation studiesHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17
Unauthenticated | Downloaded 07/24/23
E. Coopersmith, B. Minsker, M. Sivapalan (2014)
Using hydro-climatic and edaphic similarity to enhance soil moisture predictionHydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 11
T. Jackson, M. Cosh, R. Bindlish, P. Starks, D. Bosch, M. Seyfried, D. Goodrich, M. Moran, Jinyang Du (2010)
Validation of Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer Soil Moisture ProductsIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48
T. Ochsner, M. Cosh, R. Cuenca, W. Dorigo, C. Draper, Y. Hagimoto, Y. Kerr, K. Larson, E. Njoku, E. Small, M. Zreda (2013)
State of the Art in Large-Scale Soil Moisture MonitoringSoil Science Society of America Journal, 77
F. Pan, C. Peters-Lidard, M. Salé (2003)
An analytical method for predicting surface soil moisture from rainfall observationsWater Resources Research, 39
E. Mas, E. Wood, Dennis Lettermaier, Bart Nijssen (1995)
Assessing the Hydrologic Impacts of Climate Change on the Colorado River Basin
W. Petersen, W. Krajewski (2013)
Status Update on the GPM Ground Validation Iowa Flood Studies (IFloodS) Field Experiment
J. Jacobs, B. Mohanty, En-Ching Hsu, Douglas Miller (2004)
SMEX02: Field scale variability, time stability and similarity of soil moistureRemote Sensing of Environment, 92
R. Bindlish, T. Jackson, A. Gasiewski, M. Klein, E. Njoku (2006)
Soil moisture mapping and AMSR-E validation using the PSR in SMEX02Remote Sensing of Environment, 103
D. Lin, E. Wood, Bangjie Yang (1994)
Development and testing of a remote sensing based hydrologic modelProceedings of IGARSS '94 - 1994 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 3
N. Rao, P. Sarma, S. Chander (1988)
Irrigation scheduling under a limited water supplyAgricultural Water Management, 15
E. Coopersmith, B. Minsker, Craig Wenzel, B. Gilmore (2014)
Machine learning assessments of soil drying for agricultural planningComputers and Electronics in Agriculture, 104
K. Mitchell, D. Lohmann, P. Houser, E. Wood, J. Schaake, A. Robock, B. Cosgrove, J. Sheffield, Q. Duan, L. Luo, R. Higgins, R. Pinker, J. Tarpley, D. Lettenmaier, C. Marshall, J. Entin, M. Pan, W. Shi, V. Koren, J. Meng, B. Ramsay, Andrew Bailey (2004)
The multi‐institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling systemJournal of Geophysical Research, 109
M. Cosh, W. Brutsaert (1999)
Aspects of soil moisture variability in the Washita '92 study regionJournal of Geophysical Research, 104
J. Entin (2008)
Soil Moisture Active-Passive Mission (SMAP)
F. Pan (2012)
Estimating Daily Surface Soil Moisture Using a Daily Diagnostic Soil Moisture EquationJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-asce, 138
S. Ye, M. Yaeger, E. Coopersmith, Lei Cheng, M. Sivapalan (2012)
Exploring the physical controls of regional patterns of flow duration curves – Part 2: Role of seasonality, the regime curve, and associated process controlsHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16
R. Grayson, A. Western, F. Chiew, G. Blöschl (1997)
Preferred states in spatial soil moisture patterns: Local and nonlocal controlsWater Resources Research, 33
R. Reichle, R. Koster, G. Lannoy, Barton Forman, Qing Liu, S. Mahanama, A. Toure (2011)
Assessment and Enhancement of MERRA Land Surface Hydrology EstimatesJournal of Climate, 24
AbstractSoil moisture monitoring with in situ technology is a time-consuming and costly endeavor for which a method of increasing the resolution of spatial estimates across in situ networks is necessary. Using a simple hydrologic model, the estimation capacity of an in situ watershed network can be increased beyond the station distribution by using available precipitation, soil, and topographic information. A study site was selected on the Iowa River, characterized by homogeneous soil and topographic features, reducing the variables to precipitation only. Using 10-km precipitation estimates from the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) for 2013, high-resolution estimates of surface soil moisture were generated in coordination with an in situ network, which was deployed as part of the Iowa Flood Studies (IFloodS). A simple, bucket model for soil moisture at each in situ sensor was calibrated using four precipitation products and subsequently validated at both the sensor for which it was calibrated and other proximal sensors, the latter after a bias correction step. Average RMSE values of 0.031 and 0.045 m3 m−3 were obtained for models validated at the sensor for which they were calibrated and at other nearby sensors, respectively.
Journal of Hydrometeorology – American Meteorological Society
Published: Jun 25, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.