AbstractA statistical distribution commonly used for describing measured wind speed data is the Weibull distribution. A review of the methods found in the statistical literature for the purpose of estimation of the parameters in Weibull distributions is given, with a special emphasis on the efficiency of the different methods. From this review, the most appropriate method for a given application can be chosen. The general conclusion is that maximum likelihood estimators should be used due to their large sample efficiency. However, they require an iterative minimization. The recommended closed form estimators when there are few observations (say, less than 25) are the least-squares estimators. If wind speed data with a good speed resolution are available, the closed form ten fractile estimators are very good. The simplest are the two fractile estimators. They, however, require around three times as many observations as the maximum likelihood estimators in order to be of the same accuracy. If mean and standard deviation of the logarithms of the wind speed are available, Menon's moment estimators can be used. They are of closed form, and are slightly more efficient than the two fractile types. If only median and quantiles are known, the two fractile estimators can be used. For Danish wind speed data, measured by two cup anemometers with relatively high thresholds (2 m s1), it is shown that improved estimations are obtained when the methods for censored data are used. Finally, use of the effective number of observations in evaluation of the quality of the distributional fits in cases with autocorrelated data is suggested.
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera