Potential to constrain projections of hot temperature extremes

Potential to constrain projections of hot temperature extremes AbstractProjected changes in temperature extremes, such as regional changes in the intensity and frequency of hot extremes differ strongly across climate models. We show that this disagreement can be partly explained by discrepancies in the representation of the present-day temperature distribution, motivating evaluation of models with observations. By evaluating models on carefully selected metrics, we identified models that are more likely to be reliable for long-term projections of temperature extremes. We found that frequencies of hot extremes are likely to increase at a higher rate than the multi-model mean estimate over large parts of the Northern Hemisphere and Australia. This implies that a higher degree of adaptation is required for a given global temperature target. We also find that projected changes in the intensity of hot extremes can be constrained in several regions including Australia, Central North America and North Asia. In many other regions, large internal variability can often hamper model evaluation. For both aspects, the intensity and the frequency of hot extremes, the total area over which the constraints can be implemented is limited by the quality and completeness of observations. Thereby, this study highlights the importance of long-term high quality and easily accessible observational records for model evaluation that are vital to ultimately reduce uncertainties in projections of temperature extremes. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Climate American Meteorological Society

Potential to constrain projections of hot temperature extremes

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/potential-to-constrain-projections-of-hot-temperature-extremes-HWL030VT1y
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0442
D.O.I.
10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0848.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractProjected changes in temperature extremes, such as regional changes in the intensity and frequency of hot extremes differ strongly across climate models. We show that this disagreement can be partly explained by discrepancies in the representation of the present-day temperature distribution, motivating evaluation of models with observations. By evaluating models on carefully selected metrics, we identified models that are more likely to be reliable for long-term projections of temperature extremes. We found that frequencies of hot extremes are likely to increase at a higher rate than the multi-model mean estimate over large parts of the Northern Hemisphere and Australia. This implies that a higher degree of adaptation is required for a given global temperature target. We also find that projected changes in the intensity of hot extremes can be constrained in several regions including Australia, Central North America and North Asia. In many other regions, large internal variability can often hamper model evaluation. For both aspects, the intensity and the frequency of hot extremes, the total area over which the constraints can be implemented is limited by the quality and completeness of observations. Thereby, this study highlights the importance of long-term high quality and easily accessible observational records for model evaluation that are vital to ultimately reduce uncertainties in projections of temperature extremes.

Journal

Journal of ClimateAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Sep 27, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial