On the Lack of Accountability in Meteorological Research

On the Lack of Accountability in Meteorological Research commentary and analysis 1 • Introduction a result or to consider contradictions with earlier stud- ies brought to the investigator's attention. There are three primary means by which scientific The presentation in many papers is careless. Units research is most commonly evaluated. One is by re- or constants may not be provided. Grid resolution may view and competition of proposals, another is by ques- not be given. Comparisons may be made between two tioning in public presentations, and the third is by schemes without one of the schemes being adequately review of publications, both before and after their dis- described. Definitions may be absent. Preprocessing, semination. The last includes the scientific process by postprocessing, or scaling factors may be applied but which new experiments are performed to support or not described. It is not just ancillary information that is reject proposed theories. Indeed, the peer review pro- lacking, but rather critical details necessary for properly cess is considered sacrosanct in science. interpreting the primary results. Without such infor- All researchers and their managers will admit that mation, in fact, composing scientific reviews is often the evaluation processes do not work perfectly. Of rendered extremely difficult or even impossible: How http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society American Meteorological Society

On the Lack of Accountability in Meteorological Research

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/on-the-lack-of-accountability-in-meteorological-research-PLQBBALBm8
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0477
D.O.I.
10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<1333:CAAOTL>2.3.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

commentary and analysis 1 • Introduction a result or to consider contradictions with earlier stud- ies brought to the investigator's attention. There are three primary means by which scientific The presentation in many papers is careless. Units research is most commonly evaluated. One is by re- or constants may not be provided. Grid resolution may view and competition of proposals, another is by ques- not be given. Comparisons may be made between two tioning in public presentations, and the third is by schemes without one of the schemes being adequately review of publications, both before and after their dis- described. Definitions may be absent. Preprocessing, semination. The last includes the scientific process by postprocessing, or scaling factors may be applied but which new experiments are performed to support or not described. It is not just ancillary information that is reject proposed theories. Indeed, the peer review pro- lacking, but rather critical details necessary for properly cess is considered sacrosanct in science. interpreting the primary results. Without such infor- All researchers and their managers will admit that mation, in fact, composing scientific reviews is often the evaluation processes do not work perfectly. Of rendered extremely difficult or even impossible: How

Journal

Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Jun 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off