Observational Consistency Comparison and Analyses of an X-band All Solid-state Radar and an X-band Klystron Doppler Radar

Observational Consistency Comparison and Analyses of an X-band All Solid-state Radar and an... AbstractSolid-state weather radar transmitters offer great potential for increased reliability and maintainability, which have been proven to be critical for practical use. Although they have been implemented in radar systems, solid-state transmitters are incapable to produce as high peak power as available in klystrons. Pulse compression technique coupled with mismatched methods allows for low peak-power transmission and can improve the range resolution and detection performance on the receiving end of a radar system. However, applying solid-state transmitters with pulse compression in weather radar systems still requires strong evidence for the data reliability. With side-by-side observational experiments, this study compares a solid-state weather radar with combined-pulse transmission mode to a close-by klystron Doppler weather radar in an attempt to: 1) analyze the capability of the solid-state radar in reducing the near-range blind zone; and 2) validate the quality and reliability of data from a solid-state radar that is implemented with the pulse compression technique. The data from the klystron Doppler weather radar is considered accurate and used as a reference for quantitatively evaluating the solid-state radar data quality and reliability. Comparisons and statistics show that the observations from the solid-state radar are consistent with that from the klystron Doppler weather radar, especially in heavy rainfall. Results from the analysis indicate that solid-state weather radar has high estimation accuracy in both near and far ranges. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology American Meteorological Society

Observational Consistency Comparison and Analyses of an X-band All Solid-state Radar and an X-band Klystron Doppler Radar

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/observational-consistency-comparison-and-analyses-of-an-x-band-all-4C2FhTEJlU
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0426
D.O.I.
10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0220.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractSolid-state weather radar transmitters offer great potential for increased reliability and maintainability, which have been proven to be critical for practical use. Although they have been implemented in radar systems, solid-state transmitters are incapable to produce as high peak power as available in klystrons. Pulse compression technique coupled with mismatched methods allows for low peak-power transmission and can improve the range resolution and detection performance on the receiving end of a radar system. However, applying solid-state transmitters with pulse compression in weather radar systems still requires strong evidence for the data reliability. With side-by-side observational experiments, this study compares a solid-state weather radar with combined-pulse transmission mode to a close-by klystron Doppler weather radar in an attempt to: 1) analyze the capability of the solid-state radar in reducing the near-range blind zone; and 2) validate the quality and reliability of data from a solid-state radar that is implemented with the pulse compression technique. The data from the klystron Doppler weather radar is considered accurate and used as a reference for quantitatively evaluating the solid-state radar data quality and reliability. Comparisons and statistics show that the observations from the solid-state radar are consistent with that from the klystron Doppler weather radar, especially in heavy rainfall. Results from the analysis indicate that solid-state weather radar has high estimation accuracy in both near and far ranges.

Journal

Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologyAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Jul 24, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off