Observational Consistency Comparison and Analyses of an X-band All Solid-state Radar and an X-band Klystron Doppler Radar

Observational Consistency Comparison and Analyses of an X-band All Solid-state Radar and an... AbstractSolid-state weather radar transmitters offer great potential for increased reliability and maintainability, which have been proven to be critical for practical use. Although they have been implemented in radar systems, solid-state transmitters are incapable to produce as high peak power as available in klystrons. Pulse compression technique coupled with mismatched methods allows for low peak-power transmission and can improve the range resolution and detection performance on the receiving end of a radar system. However, applying solid-state transmitters with pulse compression in weather radar systems still requires strong evidence for the data reliability. With side-by-side observational experiments, this study compares a solid-state weather radar with combined-pulse transmission mode to a close-by klystron Doppler weather radar in an attempt to: 1) analyze the capability of the solid-state radar in reducing the near-range blind zone; and 2) validate the quality and reliability of data from a solid-state radar that is implemented with the pulse compression technique. The data from the klystron Doppler weather radar is considered accurate and used as a reference for quantitatively evaluating the solid-state radar data quality and reliability. Comparisons and statistics show that the observations from the solid-state radar are consistent with that from the klystron Doppler weather radar, especially in heavy rainfall. Results from the analysis indicate that solid-state weather radar has high estimation accuracy in both near and far ranges. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology American Meteorological Society

Observational Consistency Comparison and Analyses of an X-band All Solid-state Radar and an X-band Klystron Doppler Radar

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/observational-consistency-comparison-and-analyses-of-an-x-band-all-4C2FhTEJlU
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0426
D.O.I.
10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0220.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractSolid-state weather radar transmitters offer great potential for increased reliability and maintainability, which have been proven to be critical for practical use. Although they have been implemented in radar systems, solid-state transmitters are incapable to produce as high peak power as available in klystrons. Pulse compression technique coupled with mismatched methods allows for low peak-power transmission and can improve the range resolution and detection performance on the receiving end of a radar system. However, applying solid-state transmitters with pulse compression in weather radar systems still requires strong evidence for the data reliability. With side-by-side observational experiments, this study compares a solid-state weather radar with combined-pulse transmission mode to a close-by klystron Doppler weather radar in an attempt to: 1) analyze the capability of the solid-state radar in reducing the near-range blind zone; and 2) validate the quality and reliability of data from a solid-state radar that is implemented with the pulse compression technique. The data from the klystron Doppler weather radar is considered accurate and used as a reference for quantitatively evaluating the solid-state radar data quality and reliability. Comparisons and statistics show that the observations from the solid-state radar are consistent with that from the klystron Doppler weather radar, especially in heavy rainfall. Results from the analysis indicate that solid-state weather radar has high estimation accuracy in both near and far ranges.

Journal

Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologyAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Jul 24, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from Google Scholar, PubMed
Create lists to organize your research
Export lists, citations
Access to DeepDyve database
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off