Inter-comparison of model-estimated potential evapotranspiration on the Tibetan Plateau during 1981-2010

Inter-comparison of model-estimated potential evapotranspiration on the Tibetan Plateau during... AbstractPotential evapotranspiration (PET), the maximum evapotranspiration rate under unlimited water supply, reflects the capacity for transpiration flow and plant primary production. Numerous models have been developed to quantify PET, but there are still large uncertainties in PET estimations. In this study, we conducted spatially explicit estimations of daily PET from 1981 to 2010 for 8 different land-cover types on the Tibetan Plateau, by applying three types of PET models including a combination model (Penman-Monteith), a radiation-based model (Priestley-Taylor) and a temperature-based model (Thornthwaite). We found that the PET estimated by Thornthwaite model (PETT) was lower than those estimated by Priestley-Taylor (PETPT) and Penman-Monteith models (PETPM). Penman-Monteith model gave the highest estimates of PET on annual and daily scales. The mean annual PET for the whole plateau estimated by these three models varied from 675.1 to 700.5 mm·year-1 and daily PET varied from 1.33 to 1.92 mm day-1. The spatial pattern of PETT did not agree with the PETPT and PETPM, while the latter two agreed well with each other. Due to different model structures and dominant meteorological drivers, the inter-annual variability of PET varied significantly among the models. PETPT and PETPM showed a transition around 1993 since the dominant meteorological drivers were different before and after 1993. These disagreements among different models suggested that PET models with different algorithms should be used with caution. This study provided a validation to assist those undertaking PET estimations on the Tibetan Plateau. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Earth Interactions American Meteorological Society

Inter-comparison of model-estimated potential evapotranspiration on the Tibetan Plateau during 1981-2010

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/inter-comparison-of-model-estimated-potential-evapotranspiration-on-Q8PVA4NBJ0
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1087-3562
D.O.I.
10.1175/EI-D-16-0020.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractPotential evapotranspiration (PET), the maximum evapotranspiration rate under unlimited water supply, reflects the capacity for transpiration flow and plant primary production. Numerous models have been developed to quantify PET, but there are still large uncertainties in PET estimations. In this study, we conducted spatially explicit estimations of daily PET from 1981 to 2010 for 8 different land-cover types on the Tibetan Plateau, by applying three types of PET models including a combination model (Penman-Monteith), a radiation-based model (Priestley-Taylor) and a temperature-based model (Thornthwaite). We found that the PET estimated by Thornthwaite model (PETT) was lower than those estimated by Priestley-Taylor (PETPT) and Penman-Monteith models (PETPM). Penman-Monteith model gave the highest estimates of PET on annual and daily scales. The mean annual PET for the whole plateau estimated by these three models varied from 675.1 to 700.5 mm·year-1 and daily PET varied from 1.33 to 1.92 mm day-1. The spatial pattern of PETT did not agree with the PETPT and PETPM, while the latter two agreed well with each other. Due to different model structures and dominant meteorological drivers, the inter-annual variability of PET varied significantly among the models. PETPT and PETPM showed a transition around 1993 since the dominant meteorological drivers were different before and after 1993. These disagreements among different models suggested that PET models with different algorithms should be used with caution. This study provided a validation to assist those undertaking PET estimations on the Tibetan Plateau.

Journal

Earth InteractionsAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Nov 2, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from Google Scholar, PubMed
Create lists to organize your research
Export lists, citations
Access to DeepDyve database
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off