Improved Model Output and Statistics through Model Consensus

Improved Model Output and Statistics through Model Consensus Consensus forecasts are computed by averaging model output statistics (MOS) forecasts based on the limited-area fine-mesh (LFM) model and the nested grid model (NGM) for the three-year period 199092. The test consists of four weather elements (max/min temperature, wind speed, probability of cloud amount, and 12-h probability of precipitation) at four projection times from each initialization (0000 and 1200 UTC) for roughly 250350 stations. Verification results clearly indicate a substantial improvement for the consensus MOS over both the LFM and NGM MOS forecasts for all variables and all lead times. The accuracy increase is on par with a 28-yr scientific advancement and a 412-h lead time improvement. Moreover, performance of the consensus MOS forecasts is similar to subjective forecasts issued by the National Weather Service.These results are illustrative of the broad need to adopt a strategy of statistically combining available forecast products rather than relying upon the single most superior product (such as the newest numerical model). Furthermore, there appears to be strong justification to continue support for the entire LFM MOS product both in terms of its full availability and its equation upgrade. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society American Meteorological Society

Improved Model Output and Statistics through Model Consensus

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/improved-model-output-and-statistics-through-model-consensus-hF5hePIhIg
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0477
D.O.I.
10.1175/1520-0477(1995)076<1157:IMOSFT>2.0.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Consensus forecasts are computed by averaging model output statistics (MOS) forecasts based on the limited-area fine-mesh (LFM) model and the nested grid model (NGM) for the three-year period 199092. The test consists of four weather elements (max/min temperature, wind speed, probability of cloud amount, and 12-h probability of precipitation) at four projection times from each initialization (0000 and 1200 UTC) for roughly 250350 stations. Verification results clearly indicate a substantial improvement for the consensus MOS over both the LFM and NGM MOS forecasts for all variables and all lead times. The accuracy increase is on par with a 28-yr scientific advancement and a 412-h lead time improvement. Moreover, performance of the consensus MOS forecasts is similar to subjective forecasts issued by the National Weather Service.These results are illustrative of the broad need to adopt a strategy of statistically combining available forecast products rather than relying upon the single most superior product (such as the newest numerical model). Furthermore, there appears to be strong justification to continue support for the entire LFM MOS product both in terms of its full availability and its equation upgrade.

Journal

Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Jul 9, 1995

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off