Improved Model Output and Statistics through Model Consensus

Improved Model Output and Statistics through Model Consensus Consensus forecasts are computed by averaging model output statistics (MOS) forecasts based on the limited-area fine-mesh (LFM) model and the nested grid model (NGM) for the three-year period 199092. The test consists of four weather elements (max/min temperature, wind speed, probability of cloud amount, and 12-h probability of precipitation) at four projection times from each initialization (0000 and 1200 UTC) for roughly 250350 stations. Verification results clearly indicate a substantial improvement for the consensus MOS over both the LFM and NGM MOS forecasts for all variables and all lead times. The accuracy increase is on par with a 28-yr scientific advancement and a 412-h lead time improvement. Moreover, performance of the consensus MOS forecasts is similar to subjective forecasts issued by the National Weather Service.These results are illustrative of the broad need to adopt a strategy of statistically combining available forecast products rather than relying upon the single most superior product (such as the newest numerical model). Furthermore, there appears to be strong justification to continue support for the entire LFM MOS product both in terms of its full availability and its equation upgrade. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society American Meteorological Society

Improved Model Output and Statistics through Model Consensus

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/improved-model-output-and-statistics-through-model-consensus-hF5hePIhIg
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0477
D.O.I.
10.1175/1520-0477(1995)076<1157:IMOSFT>2.0.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Consensus forecasts are computed by averaging model output statistics (MOS) forecasts based on the limited-area fine-mesh (LFM) model and the nested grid model (NGM) for the three-year period 199092. The test consists of four weather elements (max/min temperature, wind speed, probability of cloud amount, and 12-h probability of precipitation) at four projection times from each initialization (0000 and 1200 UTC) for roughly 250350 stations. Verification results clearly indicate a substantial improvement for the consensus MOS over both the LFM and NGM MOS forecasts for all variables and all lead times. The accuracy increase is on par with a 28-yr scientific advancement and a 412-h lead time improvement. Moreover, performance of the consensus MOS forecasts is similar to subjective forecasts issued by the National Weather Service.These results are illustrative of the broad need to adopt a strategy of statistically combining available forecast products rather than relying upon the single most superior product (such as the newest numerical model). Furthermore, there appears to be strong justification to continue support for the entire LFM MOS product both in terms of its full availability and its equation upgrade.

Journal

Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Jul 9, 1995

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial