How Well Does Noah-MP Simulate the Regional Mean and Spatial Variability of Topsoil Water Content in Two Agricultural Landscapes in Southwest Germany?

How Well Does Noah-MP Simulate the Regional Mean and Spatial Variability of Topsoil Water Content... AbstractThe spatial variability of topsoil water content (SWC) is often expressed through the relationship between its spatial mean 〈θ〉 and standard deviation σθ. The present study tests the concept that a reasonably performing land surface model (LSM) should be able to produce σθ–〈θ〉 data pairs that fall into a polygon, spanned by the cloud of observed data and two anchor points: σθ at the permanent wilting point σθ–〈θwp〉 and σθ at saturation σθ–〈θs〉. A state-of-the-art LSM, Noah-MP, was driven by atmospheric forcing data obtained from eddy covariance field measurements in two regions of southwestern Germany, Kraichgau (KR) and Swabian Alb (SA). KR is characterized with deep loess soils, whereas the soils in SA are shallow, clayey, and stony. The simulations series were compared with SWC data from soil moisture networks operating in the two study regions. The results demonstrate that Noah-MP matches temporal 〈θ〉 dynamics fairly well in KR, but performs poorly in SA. The best match is achieved with the van Genuchten–Mualem representation of soil hydraulic functions and site-specific rainfall, soil texture, green vegetation fraction (GVF) and leaf area index (LAI) input data. Nevertheless, most of the simulated σθ–〈θ〉 pairs are located outside the envelope of measurements and below the lower bound, which shows that the model smooths spatial SWC variability. This can be mainly attributed to missing topography and terrain information and inadequate representation of spatial variability of soil texture and hydraulic parameters, as well as the model assumption of a uniform root distribution. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Hydrometeorology American Meteorological Society

How Well Does Noah-MP Simulate the Regional Mean and Spatial Variability of Topsoil Water Content in Two Agricultural Landscapes in Southwest Germany?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/how-well-does-noah-mp-simulate-the-regional-mean-and-spatial-Mu1qhPg87m
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1525-7541
D.O.I.
10.1175/JHM-D-17-0169.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractThe spatial variability of topsoil water content (SWC) is often expressed through the relationship between its spatial mean 〈θ〉 and standard deviation σθ. The present study tests the concept that a reasonably performing land surface model (LSM) should be able to produce σθ–〈θ〉 data pairs that fall into a polygon, spanned by the cloud of observed data and two anchor points: σθ at the permanent wilting point σθ–〈θwp〉 and σθ at saturation σθ–〈θs〉. A state-of-the-art LSM, Noah-MP, was driven by atmospheric forcing data obtained from eddy covariance field measurements in two regions of southwestern Germany, Kraichgau (KR) and Swabian Alb (SA). KR is characterized with deep loess soils, whereas the soils in SA are shallow, clayey, and stony. The simulations series were compared with SWC data from soil moisture networks operating in the two study regions. The results demonstrate that Noah-MP matches temporal 〈θ〉 dynamics fairly well in KR, but performs poorly in SA. The best match is achieved with the van Genuchten–Mualem representation of soil hydraulic functions and site-specific rainfall, soil texture, green vegetation fraction (GVF) and leaf area index (LAI) input data. Nevertheless, most of the simulated σθ–〈θ〉 pairs are located outside the envelope of measurements and below the lower bound, which shows that the model smooths spatial SWC variability. This can be mainly attributed to missing topography and terrain information and inadequate representation of spatial variability of soil texture and hydraulic parameters, as well as the model assumption of a uniform root distribution.

Journal

Journal of HydrometeorologyAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Mar 6, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off