The very strong 199798 El Nio was the first major event in which numerous forecasting groups participated in its real-time prediction. A previously developed simple statistical toolthe El NioSouthern Oscillation Climatology and Persistence (ENSOCLIPER) modelis utilized as a baseline for determination of skill in forecasting this event. Twelve statistical and dynamical models were available in real time for evaluation. Some of the models were able to outperform ENSOCLIPER in predicting either the onset or the decay of the 199798 El Nio, but none were successful at both for a medium-range two season (68 months) lead time. There were no models, including ENSOCLIPER, able to anticipate even one-half of the actual amplitude of the El Nio's peak at medium-range (611 months) lead. In addition, none of the models showed skill (i.e., lower root-mean-square error than ENSOCLIPER) at the zero season (02 months) through the two season (68 months) lead times. No dynamical model and only two of the statistical models the canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and the constructed analog (ANALOG) outperformed ENSOCLIPER by more than 5 of the root-mean-square error at the three season (911 months) and four season (1214 months) lead time. El Nio impacts were correctly anticipated by national meteorological centers one half-year in advance, because of the tendency for El Nio events to persist into and peak during the boreal winter. Despite this, the zero to two season (08 month) forecasts of the El Nio event itself were no better than ENSOCLIPER and were, in that sense, not skillfula conclusion that remains unclear to the general meteorological and oceanographic communities.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society – American Meteorological Society
Published: Sep 28, 2000
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera