How Much Skill Was There in Forecasting the Very Strong 199798 El Nio?

How Much Skill Was There in Forecasting the Very Strong 199798 El Nio? The very strong 199798 El Nio was the first major event in which numerous forecasting groups participated in its real-time prediction. A previously developed simple statistical toolthe El NioSouthern Oscillation Climatology and Persistence (ENSOCLIPER) modelis utilized as a baseline for determination of skill in forecasting this event. Twelve statistical and dynamical models were available in real time for evaluation. Some of the models were able to outperform ENSOCLIPER in predicting either the onset or the decay of the 199798 El Nio, but none were successful at both for a medium-range two season (68 months) lead time. There were no models, including ENSOCLIPER, able to anticipate even one-half of the actual amplitude of the El Nio's peak at medium-range (611 months) lead. In addition, none of the models showed skill (i.e., lower root-mean-square error than ENSOCLIPER) at the zero season (02 months) through the two season (68 months) lead times. No dynamical model and only two of the statistical models the canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and the constructed analog (ANALOG) outperformed ENSOCLIPER by more than 5 of the root-mean-square error at the three season (911 months) and four season (1214 months) lead time. El Nio impacts were correctly anticipated by national meteorological centers one half-year in advance, because of the tendency for El Nio events to persist into and peak during the boreal winter. Despite this, the zero to two season (08 month) forecasts of the El Nio event itself were no better than ENSOCLIPER and were, in that sense, not skillfula conclusion that remains unclear to the general meteorological and oceanographic communities. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society American Meteorological Society

How Much Skill Was There in Forecasting the Very Strong 199798 El Nio?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/how-much-skill-was-there-in-forecasting-the-very-strong-199798-el-nio-H3FetHF04F
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0477
D.O.I.
10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<2107:HMSWTI>2.3.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The very strong 199798 El Nio was the first major event in which numerous forecasting groups participated in its real-time prediction. A previously developed simple statistical toolthe El NioSouthern Oscillation Climatology and Persistence (ENSOCLIPER) modelis utilized as a baseline for determination of skill in forecasting this event. Twelve statistical and dynamical models were available in real time for evaluation. Some of the models were able to outperform ENSOCLIPER in predicting either the onset or the decay of the 199798 El Nio, but none were successful at both for a medium-range two season (68 months) lead time. There were no models, including ENSOCLIPER, able to anticipate even one-half of the actual amplitude of the El Nio's peak at medium-range (611 months) lead. In addition, none of the models showed skill (i.e., lower root-mean-square error than ENSOCLIPER) at the zero season (02 months) through the two season (68 months) lead times. No dynamical model and only two of the statistical models the canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and the constructed analog (ANALOG) outperformed ENSOCLIPER by more than 5 of the root-mean-square error at the three season (911 months) and four season (1214 months) lead time. El Nio impacts were correctly anticipated by national meteorological centers one half-year in advance, because of the tendency for El Nio events to persist into and peak during the boreal winter. Despite this, the zero to two season (08 month) forecasts of the El Nio event itself were no better than ENSOCLIPER and were, in that sense, not skillfula conclusion that remains unclear to the general meteorological and oceanographic communities.

Journal

Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Sep 28, 2000

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off