Downscaling extreme precipitation from CMIP5 simulations using historical analogs

Downscaling extreme precipitation from CMIP5 simulations using historical analogs AbstractAn approach for downscaling daily precipitation extremes using historical analogs is applied to simulations from Phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). The method employs a multi-step procedure in which the occurrence of extreme precipitation on a given target day is determined based on the probability of extreme precipitation on that day’s closest historical analogs. If extreme precipitation is expected, daily precipitation observations associated with the historical analogs are used to approximate precipitation amounts on the target day. By applying the analog method to historical simulations, the ability of the CMIP5 models to simulate synoptic weather patterns associated with extreme precipitation is assessed. Differences between downscaled and observed precipitation extremes are investigated by comparing the precipitation frequency distributions for a subset of rarely selected extreme analog days with those for all observed extreme precipitation days. A supplemental composite analysis of the synoptic weather patterns on these rarely selected analog days is utilized to elucidate the meteorological factors contributing to such discrepancies.Overall, the analog method as applied to CMIP5 hindcast simulations yields realistic estimates of historical precipitation extremes, with return period precipitation biases comparable in magnitude to those obtained from dynamically downscaled simulations. The analysis of rarely selected analog days reveals that extreme precipitation amounts on these days are generally larger than extreme precipitation amounts on all extreme precipitation days, leading to an underestimation of return period precipitation amounts at many stations. Furthermore, the synoptic composite analysis reveals that tropical cyclones are a common feature on these rarely selected analog days. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology American Meteorological Society

Downscaling extreme precipitation from CMIP5 simulations using historical analogs

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/downscaling-extreme-precipitation-from-cmip5-simulations-using-fcnZqu7Ugt
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1558-8432
D.O.I.
10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0250.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractAn approach for downscaling daily precipitation extremes using historical analogs is applied to simulations from Phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). The method employs a multi-step procedure in which the occurrence of extreme precipitation on a given target day is determined based on the probability of extreme precipitation on that day’s closest historical analogs. If extreme precipitation is expected, daily precipitation observations associated with the historical analogs are used to approximate precipitation amounts on the target day. By applying the analog method to historical simulations, the ability of the CMIP5 models to simulate synoptic weather patterns associated with extreme precipitation is assessed. Differences between downscaled and observed precipitation extremes are investigated by comparing the precipitation frequency distributions for a subset of rarely selected extreme analog days with those for all observed extreme precipitation days. A supplemental composite analysis of the synoptic weather patterns on these rarely selected analog days is utilized to elucidate the meteorological factors contributing to such discrepancies.Overall, the analog method as applied to CMIP5 hindcast simulations yields realistic estimates of historical precipitation extremes, with return period precipitation biases comparable in magnitude to those obtained from dynamically downscaled simulations. The analysis of rarely selected analog days reveals that extreme precipitation amounts on these days are generally larger than extreme precipitation amounts on all extreme precipitation days, leading to an underestimation of return period precipitation amounts at many stations. Furthermore, the synoptic composite analysis reveals that tropical cyclones are a common feature on these rarely selected analog days.

Journal

Journal of Applied Meteorology and ClimatologyAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Jul 17, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off